Truth. Those facts. This is so far off field, this is ispolitical. This is totally political. And it is a dangerous moment for our country that the doj has i mean, doesnt the meeting on the tarmac with bill clinton and the airplane look quaint now . Actually, thats a perfect it looks quaint. We have been talking about what feels like a frantic publicrelations effort. Two statements released from william barr on a report hes had for some time. An extraordinary report about ao open,t ongoing investigation. Some of the most sensitive intelligence and Law Enforcement in our country. And now, guess whos weighing in . Guess. Guess. Guess. Donald j. Trump. Lets listen. Okay. Thank you very much. The ig report just came out. And i was just briefed on it and its a disgrace whats happened with respect to the things that were done to our country. It should never again happen to another president. It is incredible. Far worse than i would have ever thought possible. And its its an embarrassment to
With the findings in the horowitz report. Horrow its seems to be giving the fbi that part of the investigation saying its a clean bill. They had enough reason to do this investigation. Everybody who was interviewed cements to indicate they did not open an investigation. Evan perez, thank you so much. Joining our panel now, we have with us jim bakker. You are not singled out the report makes clear the fbi failed when it came to the administering the fisa warrants, too much was left out or not presented to the court. Do you accept what the Inspector General is saying . I am there are two big groups of conclusions, one is, it was not a politically motivated
investigation and it was properly predicated with us goingforward with that investigation. It was malpractice for us not to open this investigation. All of the statements that it was a hoax are wrong. The investigation was not a coup or a coup attempt. Having said that, he does point out many mistakes that were made with respect to err
Ahead and have your vote because he wants to get back to the business of the American People. A lot of good Talking Points with the economy and stock market so i think hes going to say im the president and focused on the business at hand and focused on something he believes is unimportant in the end. The event that he is doing today is on School Choice and a big issue for the republican party, hes got some results there and we have the president now talking about the horowitz report, we have that tape for you right here. President trump thank you very much. The ig report just came out and i was just briefed on it and its a disgrace what has happened with respect to the things that were done to our country. Should never again happen to another president. It is incredible, far worse than i wouldve ever thought
possible, and that is an embarrassment to our country, it is dishonest. It is everything that a lot of people thought it would be except far worse. So im going to get some very det
investigative committee has received evidence from multiple witnesses who testified that president trump was provided specific talking points in the july 25th call. is that correct? . the talking points certainly were part of the u.s. policy and they included anti-corruption efforts. those talking points were provided to help the president effectively communicate calls with foreign leaders, is that right? that is correct. it s a routine process that the security council does. the president is able to use them or not use them. the president is not required to use them. he not only veered off from them. but he went to his own personal interest. it is fair to say such talking points signal the purpose of a given call, correct? yes. witnessed testified that the talking points for the july 25th
and received evidence from multiple witnesses that testify that he was provided specific talking points in preparation for the july 25th call geared toward protecting the american people s national security, is that correct? the talking points certainly were part of the official u.s. policy and included anticorruption efforts and national security efforts, yes. those talking points were to help communicate official u.s. policy is that right? that is correct, a routine process that the national security council does but the president generally is able to use them or not use them, what was so startling here is that it not only veered off from them, but that he went to his own personal interests. is it fair to say they signal the purpose of a given call, correct? yes. witnesses testify the talking