The georgia case is for a lot of these we need translators, former prosecutors. What fani willis charged was the clearest thing we all saw with our own eyes. And i had this conversation in the 8 00 hour. What trump told his voters his first year as president in 2017 from a podium was dont believe what you see, dont believe what you hear, only believe me. And what fani willis indicted yesterday just blows that out of the water. In state court we could see with our own eyes. And my understanding again, youre the lawyer in these conversations was that if this, then that. So if this criminal enterprise with us corrupt in nature and all in pursuance of a crime, then all of these acts were a part of it and all these people were a part of it. From the outside having worked in politics, thats what it looked like to me. So, to read that narrative is what made that indictment, the fourth in just a few short months, different from the others. I agree. I think you put that very well. Sometimes we
here are receipts from giuliani s lying claims in a georgia legislative meeting. dominion and smartmatic, the connection to hugo chavez. it s a highly inaccurate machine. there s overwhelming evidence of fraud. you don t have to be a genius to know they aren t legitimate votes. he can lie about that in public, but lying to the authorities are illegal, as that former prosecutor knows bether than most hem faces his first charges, as does lawyer sidney powell, seven counts for her repeated plot with plans to willfully tamp we are electronic ballot markers and tabulating machines. now, powell hurt her case by writing this down in a contract with a data firm and then traveled for the purpose of willfully tampering with