Donald trumps legal team can show him the sensitive materials in the case, but trump cannot take notes on any information that would identify witnesses and, according to the Protective Order, quote, during any time that the defendant reviews sensitive materials outside of Defense Councils presents, the defendant must not have access to any device capable of photocopying, recording, or otherwise replicating the sensitive materials, including a smart cellular device. This Protective Order was a partial win for jack smiths team, who originally sought to prevent the public release of all evidence given to donald trump. Lets not forget these rules for sensitive materials are being enforced on the twice impeached former president who was comfortable with leaving classified documents in a bathroom at his florida residence. Donald trumps legal team has stuck to a very obvious strategy in this case. We naked about First Amendment rights, delay, and then make it some more and then try the case i
Your friday night. You too, buddy. All right. Today, the federal judge overseeing Special Counsel jack smiths case into Donald Trumps attempt to overturn the 2020 election and shoot a Protective Order. Judge Tanya Chutkan establish limits on what evidence in the case trump cant discuss publicly. Judge chutkan ordered that donald trump cannot disclose sensitive materials, including recordings, transcripts, interview reports, and related exhibits of witness interviews and materials obtained from other governmental entities. Donald trumps legal team can show him the sensitive materials in the case, but trump cannot take notes on any information that would identify witnesses and, according to the Protective Order, quote, during any time that the defendant reviews sensitive materials outside of Defense Councils presents, the defendant must not have access to any device capable of photocopying, recording, or otherwise replicating the sensitive materials, including a smart cellular device. Th
But from what you know of the case, are there any, are there other charges that a potential georgia indictment could include that we have not seen against trump yet? yes. georgia has a number of statutes that talk about election interference and title 21 of the georgia code, that is solicitation to commit election interference, conspiracy to commit election interference, tampering with ballots, those have been part of the georgia code for a number of years and could be stand-alone acts independent of rico that the state could bring against mr. trump. one more real quick question for you. do you think there is any possibility that donald trump does not get indicted, but everybody else does? i don t, jonathan. i just don t. i asked that question because generals coleman junior, when he was on my weekend show last week, he said that he thinks donald trump will be
one more real quick question for you. do you think there is any possibility that donald trump does not get indicted, but everybody else does? i don t, jonathan. i just don t. i asked that question because generals coleman junior, when he was on my weekend show last week, he said that he thinks donald trump will be indicted in georgia, but he wouldn t be surprised if he weren t indicted. so i m asking everybody what they think. amy lee copeland, thank you very much for coming to the last word. and, coming up, the seven states both red and blue have now voted again and again to protect abortion rights since the supreme court overturned roe v. wade and both democrats and republicans have noticed. that is why democrats are looking at a national strategy to make as many 2024 campaigns as possible about reproductive health. senator tina smith at the great state of minnesota will join us, that is next.