carley: that was the 7:00 hour. it s still looking good. do we have the lift bridge? probably not. carley: i don t see any bridges there. looks too wide for a bridge. they don t know how to build them in canada. i could think of heavy machinery we could roll north and start calling it new canada. carley: are you declaring war on canada? that s what it sounds like. liberation. carley: a softer word. i could be in for that. carley: i think a lot of the truckers would too. we joke. our friends in canada, beautiful scenery. welcome to the fourth and final hour of fox & friends. carley: we re going to stick with the theme. president biden is set to kick off a five day trip an hour from now. he ll start in the u.k. for a meeting with king charles before heading to the nato summit in lithuania. i wonder if hunter s coming and how many deals he ll make on the side. alexandria, what do you have from washington for us. reporter: president biden will meet with king c
along with analysts chuck rosenberg and lisa rubin. what can we expect based on arguments put forward in advance by both sides? reporter: to set the scene, because donald trump is here in person the security has really been ramped up. there s a much greater police presence. in terms of in the courtroom, this is a long shot for donald trump, this idea that a former president can t be prosecuted for any acts whited while serving in offense, it s belied by the fact that gerald ford pardoned richard nixon. this three-judge panel is an all-female panel with two judges appointed by president biden and one appointed by former president george h.w. bush. in addition to arguing immunity, trump lawyers are also making the argument that this produce is improper under double jeopardy. ken, i need to interrupt you because the hearing is starting. let s listen in right now. our jurisdiction was challenged by an amicus. you are not questioning our collateral order jurisdiction? [indis
it s also a strategic appeal. just for perspective here, we remember doj seized 11,000 documents out of mar-a-lago. they don t like the special master ruling as to any of it. they lost on all 11,000 documents. what they re doing is saying okay, let s carve out the most important to us doj 100 of those documents. they ve given up on there being a special master for the other 10,900 other documents but with respect to those classified documents, those should not go to the special master, we should be able to use them in the criminal investigation and national security investigation, by doing that they limited the upside and won t get the special master kicked out all together but limited their downside because if you take an appeal and lose on the whole thing in the 11th circuit, that s really bad for doj and sets a worse precedent for doj so i think they re trying to be tactical and strategic in what they re choosing to go after here. this whole process is getting dragged ou