This is something the president predicted was right was never a legal basis for this, correct . President trump won the legal argument today. And the Supreme Court came out on his side and lifted the stay that the Appeals Court put in place. But the legal argument was never the strongest argument against the ban. Its the policy argument. Really bad policy. Tucker will you concede that there was a legal argument against it, that the left as a group made and it was that a single judge in hawaii had more power over americas Foreign Policy and control of americas borders than the president did and the Supreme Court today said thats absurd. It wasnt just hawaii, tucker. There were a number of court cases in a number of courts that stayed this travel order. And it was a close call legally. It was a close call for the Appeals Court that upheld the stay. It was also a close call for the Supreme Court. Tucker the president has got a right to make judgments like this and enforce them with law. T
Thats why we have a president. You will concede that. I think thats a valid argument and thats the argument that was made. Thats one of the arguments that persuaded the Supreme Court today. Although, keep in mind, that the court only lifted the stay. It will hear the merits of the case in october. But, yes, you are right. But, as i said, the stronger argument against this travel ban is its really bad policy. It doesnt accomplish the goal which is notomake america safer. Tucker it doesnt. You would argue the counter case that the more immigrants that we have from say somali coming into the country the safer we are . What point are you making. What i would argue on Policy Grounds this ban is both too broad and not broad enough. Let me explain. Heres why its too broad. It denies muslims from six predominantly muslim countries. Tucker let me stop and correct you. It makes no reference to religion at all. It doesnt badge muslims. It bans people who live in six countries the Obama Administra
tucker: except a pretty small group of radicals on the left. that s what i see. i see it everywhere. people justifying the shooting of steve scalise. not true. tucker: are you kidding the last week the professor in hartford, connecticut. should have let him die, et cetera. you are seeing this on msnbc host, well, how should we feel? steve scalise was a conservative? i have mixed feelings about this. there are a number of people on the left who have done repeatedly on this show basically made excuses for violence. there is no excuses for violence. tucker: good for you. there are no excuses for violence in a democracy, no. tucker: so i wouldn t say that this had anything to do with the second amendment and i would bet you money that if hodges were alive to answer questions, his views on the second amendment would be the same as the views of most liberals, which is it s not real, it s the one part of the bill of rights i get to ignore. um-huh. tucker: so you are trying t
i see it everywhere. people justifying the shooting of steve scalise. not quite true. tucker: are you kidding? the last week the professor in hartford, connecticut. h should have let him die, et cetera. you are seeing this on msnbc host, well, how should we feel? steve scalise was a conservative. i have mixed feelings about this. there are a number of people on the left who have done repeatedly on this show basically made excuses for violence. there are no excuses for violence. tucker: good for you. not in a democracy. tucker: so i wouldn t say that this had anything to do with the second amendment and i would bet you money that if hodgkinson were alive to answer questions, his views on the second amendment would be the same as the views of most liberals, which is it s not real, it s the one part of the bill of rights i get to ignore. so you are trying to paint him as some sort of second amendment supporter when he seemed to me a garden variety liberal. well, no. maybe i
small group of radicals on the left. that s what i see. i see it everywhere. people justifying the shooting of steve scalise. not true. tucker: are you kidding the last week the professor in hartford, connecticut. should have let him die, et cetera. you are seeing this on msnbc host, well, how should we feel? steve scalise was a conservative? i have mixed feelings about this. there are a number of people on the left who have done repeatedly on this show basically made excuses for violence. there is no excuses for violence. tucker: good for you. there are no excuses for violence in a democracy, no. tucker: so i wouldn t say that this had anything to do with the second amendment and i would bet you money that if hodges were alive to answer questions, his views on the second amendment would be the same as the views of most liberals, which is it s not real, it s the one part of the bill of rights i get to ignore. um-huh. tucker: so you are trying to paint him as some sort o