They are going to have - it feel so much more soli to me today than it did before i saw this indictment, though. i mean, again on, the facts but on the - it is tricky you need to be able to prov that there were deliberately falsified business records falsified with intent fo corrupt purposes, and that the were falsified in order to conceal or facilitate whit collar crime today we got the recitation of the crime and the i didn t expect that much. i thought that with all th critique that this was such bubble issue in terms of the law that it would be muc fuzzier, it would be muc harder to explain, we will b spending three or four segment trying to walk people throug what the connection was to mak his fellow many, it is brunt alvin bragg leads on lean, on it that is one of the things he i looking to move to felony. one thing that is very clea is that if you file a business record for an expense in new york, new york is a very tough state to run a business. if you file a re
what happened on january 6th, 2021, played live and unedited across all networks at the same time meaning all of us saw the same thing, trump s mobs beating up police officer, vandalizing the u.s. capitol, ransacking the floors of the senate, free of political spin, or imagination but that was then. and by 2022, the events of that day had gotten fuzzier, muddied up by partisanship so the january 6th committee made up of seven democrats and two prominent republicans, admitted their tact to sharpen the country s memory and to prove who was to blame we ll never, ever take back our country with weakness. say usa, usa in nine televised hearings, the january 6th committee set out to make their case president trump summoned the mob, assembled the mob, and lit
Seriously enough. yeah, and i think that s 80 individuals rather than 80%, 80 individuals have ties to the military. oh, forgive me, yes, you re right. 80 individuals. yes. of the roughly 700 people who have been charged, that s still a significant portion, and again, has long been a problem. and i think what s different is there was a very clear line between those who were promoting white supremacy and far right militancy and those who are actually engaging in criminal activities and acts of violence to promote it. where that line has become much fuzzier where then somebody could a sitting politician couldn t align themselves or even a prominent journalist couldn t align themselves directly with the violent fringe of this movement where that has changed, and i think that was something that former president
Prosecutor. they re not there to defend themselves. there are no rules of evidence. you get to tell them what you want to tell them and that s why everybody says you can indict a ham sandwich. there s a higher bar than getting a warrant. yes, there was process, but it doesn t mean that process can t be manipulated, and it can be corrupt and we all know it. schiff and swalwell. what a coincidence. the two trump hated most. they provided metadata, the numbers that were going around but no names and account subscriber information in terms of who they said they were looking for. but the other side of the equation gets a little bit fuzzier. they didn t give content or emails or pictures. the company says the 2018 subpoena from the doj contained no information about who the investigation was targeting or why. but it requested information on
Schiff and swalwell. they provided metadata, the numbers that were going around but no names and account subscriber information in terms of who they said they were looking for. but the other side of the equation gets a little bit fuzzier. they didn t give content or emails or pictures. the company says the 2018 subpoena from the doj contained no information about who the investigation was targeting or why. but it requested information on the targeted accounts beginning from the inceptions of the accounts through the day of the subpoena. that s typical. they are usually tailored in terms of window. however, the gag orders routinely extend far after that. why? to give prosecutors the benefit of time to work on their cases. now, microsoft tonight says it too received a subpoena in 2017 related to a congressional staffer s personal email account and as with apple, microsoft was also subject to a gag.