Son yeAh sotomAyor, she wAs pretty greAt becAuse she depArted from the lAnguAge. Im reAlly thAnkful for thAt. Oh, yeAh. For those of us frustrAted on the limits of lAnguAge. Her first line is the Courts Order is stunning. YeAh. And the whole dissent is AmAzing. It is only three And A hAlf pAges. Everybody should reAd it. She sAys the court should not be so content to ignore its constitutionAl obligAtion to protect the rights of women And the rule of lAw, period. I dissent, period. Now, justin KAgAns Dissent will Also give you blisters. But At The End, she sAys i respectfully sotomAyor just sAys, i dissent. Oops, i forgot to sAy respectfully. We will get into it tonight. Were going to get into it. It is its one of those stories thAt continuing to you get A nights sleep on this story And it is either just As bAd or worse the next dAy. There is just more to sAy, more to get into About it. It is reAlly A horrible, horrible situAtion. And imprActicAl And prActicAl terms. We were discussing
Insane last night. Reduced to one word, that was my judicial opinion, about the Texas Abortion Law, she was pretty, gray she departed from the unprecedented gentility language, and so im really thankful for that. Because she kind of spoke for those of us who are frustrated by the limits on language, in the way those guys speak. Her first line is, the Courts Order is stunning. And the whole dissent is amazing. Its only three and a half pages, everybody should read, it but you notice when you get to the very end of, it she says, the court should not be so content to ignore a constitutional obligations not only the rate to women, but also the sanctity of its president s in the Rule Of Law period, i dissent period, justice kagans dissent, will also give you blisters, but at The End of kagans dissent, she says i respectively dissent. Shes like no i just doesnt. Yes, i would forget to use that word respectfully a lot. I would just, i would just oops, i forgot to say respectfully, im very sor
us on this. we appreciate it. let s talk about what the fd sa meeting on today, the johnson & johnson booster. a recommendation from the studies of johnson & johnson. this booster to be administered two to six months after that initial dose. of course, we know that s different than moderna and pfizer recommendations for them. talk me through what you expect to hear today from the fda when it comes to the johnson & johnson booster. good morning. great to be here. we ve been talking to the 15 million americans who received one shot of johnson & johnson and formally about this issue for many months. before all the advisory committees, the fda and the cdc was the question does a second shot of johnson & johnson, is that indicated? the answer is absolutely, it is. because we do believe that a second shot for this one shotters is going to get them 90 plus% protection against hospitalization. the question to your point is what s the dosing interval? is it two months after the firs
january 6th insurrection. just heard from the fda s advisory committee. unanimously recommending johnson & johnson boosters shots who people who got j&j first time around and the panel talking about the safety and effectiveness of mixing and matching vaccines. break it down with our own medical expert reaction from the white house and this gentleman, head of the national institutes of health dr. francis collins and plus msnbc news learned from a source fach with the situation should be getting update on former president clinton soon as he remains now at a hospital in california. live on the ground. we ll bring you that update. you ll know the second we get it. i m hallie jackson back in washington this afternoon. breaking news. arrest of a capitol police officer. justice correspondent pete williams is following this. our capitol hill correspondent leigh ann caldwell also joining us. talk to us about michael riley, pete. we learned he ll remain free during this process under
immunity. then there s also we re waiting for a ruling in the civil fraud trial against trump in new york. his sons and trump organization also on the hook there. and this comes after trump was ordered to pay e. jean carroll $83 million after her defamation suit last month. can you take us inside trump s mind right now? what must he be thinking? i mean, we know he s a man who embraces grievance, but this is a lot. it s a lot but he is also an expert conpartmentalizer in a way we ve seen very few people in the political realm be. so he looks at these a couple of different ways. the carroll verdict has infuriated him. we know it s a huge amount of money. we know it s a huge amount of money he doesn t want to pay and he ll have to pay some even as he s appealing it. the colorado ballot case, his team actually feels pretty good about its chances at the supreme court. and they see that as helping them politically, which is why you saw something like that filing today. so, there