that. we are dealing with warmongers, people whose policy prescription s could have deadly consequences. nato does not want the ukraine. it is a corrupt country, more of a liability than it would be a military asset. people argue he needs to happen because russia should not have a veto over who is in nato. in other words, even when it s in our mutual interest to not have a state in nato, we have to insist they will be added just to spite the russians. that was interesting. those seem like fair points. if they are wrong, explain how. we will listen. official washington is done explaining anything, as you may have noticed. instead, the same foreign policy geniuses who brought markets to be a went insane with grace. not since we made fun of pregnant flight suits have they been this matter. fox host unabashedly makes putin it shows how they disinformation successes of russian intelligence extend