and then once it did happen, why did authorities lied to the country for months and tell us that officer of brian sicknick had been murdered by the mob when in fact the medical examiner determined he died of a stroke hours later. just tonight on cbs news, we were informed just a moment ago, as norah o donnell stared on like it was true, that five police officers were murdered by the mob. on january 6th. really? we know of one killing on january 6th, and that killing was committed by officer michael byrd, capitol hill police officer with a confirmed record of highly reckless behavior with firearms, and yet for some reason he was allowed to shoot an unarmed, nonthreatening woman. why was he allowed to do that? what was the justification? no one has ever told us. why is that? and by the way, just how many fbi agents and doj informants were active in the crowd on january 6th and what exactly were they doing there? why can t we know the answer to that question, seriously? and wh
harmeet dhillon, thank you so much. thanks, tucker. tucker: so, if you are looking for reassurance that democracy can work, look to san francisco. last night, 60% of the city s voters decided to oust chesa boudin dean, that is the district attorney who refuse to enforce the law in san francisco and turned our prettiest city into a pretty speech 20 fourish for a place, for example, @shannonbream is one of the reason people feel free to defen the streets. does that mean is district attorney you can t do anything about human feces on the street? sorry to say, the best i can do about it is use whatever platform i have, all of you on twitter, to demand more public toilets. i think public toilets are a great solution. to that problem. [applause] i will tell you what is not a good solution is having police
failed to restore free speech on the platform. the dh secretary mayorkas with a brand-new government with this information governance board. take a look at this. they just recently constituted misinformation, disinformation governance board bringing, the goal is to bring the department to gather to address this threat. sean: the united states of america, not the almighty bearer of truth. they are not allowed to place your thoughts, opinions, expressions. that is what we see in countries like iran, china, venezuela and every other authoritarian government that tries to squash any and all dissent. it is wrong. it is creepy, it is dangerous and its 1980 fourish. another example that shows the democrats real problem is with the concept of freedom itself. so i want to red the left that there is something
forced to move toward the border with turkey and abandon the fight against isis. and that will allow the resurgence of size and it will allow them to fourish. okay, thank you so much. i told you we had a lot of news. . a second whistle-blower and a major foreign policy shift were not enough, we just learned they have thrown out the lawsuit against the manhattan district attorney s office. the president s attorneys have filed and emergency appeal since the courts just said no way you have to put them forward. up next, why are so few republicans defending the
i should say afghans, not afghanis, i apologize for the mix up what does this mean for isis they are still perpetrating attacks in syria, they re smaller than they were before. is there a concern that if they pull out it would give room for isis to fourish there? there was a discussion that they would have to make sure there was a base there, what about isis this is a new dynamic for those of us worrying about afghanistan back after september 11th. and it is unclear whether or not the taliban would have the power to ensure that isis doesn t operate. we have seen clashes between them, but in addition to this broadbased civil war, there is