An ongoing story. this? a tragic decline of the new york times into a propaganda paper known as proivida in the soviet union. other conservatives including the washington examiner s contributor says it s a part of the new york times agenda to target trump. always prompts the question, what are they so afraid of a deep study of one of the most institutional parts of the country that scares and offends them. focusing on racial injustice who conceived this 1619 project conceived it and wrote the lead peace to make our founding ideal s true. also, carol hinderson, african-american, author of one person, no vote among other works. great to have you both. i guess there is some party that was prepared for some kind of backlash. what do you make of it?
The new york times agenda to target trump. always prompts the question, what are they so afraid of a deep study of one of the most institutional parts of the country that scares and offends them. focusing on racial injustice who conceived this 1619 project conceived it and wrote the lead peace to make our founding ideal s true. also, carol hinderson, african-american, author of one person, no vote among other works. great to have you both. i guess there is some party that was prepared for some kind of backlash. what do you make of it? i m not that surprised. the whole reason we did the project in the first place is because our society has been unwilling to grapple with the legacy of slavery with the centrality of slavery, to the development of the united states, so this isn t that shocking to me. but anyone would call this, though, a propaganda tool or