The first lesson, perhaps the only big lesson, although there were many, is that by adhering to National Interests and principles, you have to pay a price, you learn, you may lose in the short term, but in the long term in the long run you will receive a dividend. Including in the form of national unity. Circumstances change. And new conditions emerge for its strengthening. Studying relations with america, using the example of the shah and iran, and after him, i understand that relations with the west are temporary ties. If you give the westerners everything they want, they will take advantage of you, perhaps help you. However, when you fail to perform your functions, you will be finished. This happened to the shah of iran and many others from different countries, whose names i i dont want to mention it now, because for some this is a sensitive issue. Especially in light of their belonging to arab countries. They were with america in all adventures. But the west is simply taking advant
We will tell our viewers about the most important thing for the moment, i will start with this three detonations on explosive objects in a day, on in the mykolaiv oblast, two children were blown up by a mine, they were playing in a field outside a village in the bashtan district. A 14yearold boy died, his 12yearold friend was injured. Previously , active military operations were conducted on this territory, the ministry of internal affairs reported in the kharkiv region, in the village of kamianka. A 14yearold boy blew himself up on an explosive device. He is in the hospital, two more people were blown up by an explosive device. In chernihiv oblast, they went to the forest on the territory of the kina community of podrov. One man died, another was injured on the spot explosives are working. And then about what is happening in the kherson region. The russians covered the golden beam with fire in the kherson region , about 28 arrivals were recorded. Enemy shells hit a private house and f
Decision in this case is the first time in a court in our nations history has held that congress violated the appropriations clause by enacting a statute providing funding. This court suld uphold the cfpbs funding statute because it is fmly grounded in constitutional tt and in historical practic dating back to the founding. The text of the constitution shows that when the frars one to limit Congress Appropriations authority they did expressly. While the frars restricted appropriations for the army to two years, they applied no similar limits on apppriations for any other agency. History conrms that. Since the Founding Congress has consistently funded agencies through standing appropriations that are not timelimited and that provide significant discretion over how much to spen the First Congress did exactly this at the very first agency it created the Customs Service, a the same is true for of t founding era agencies including the post office, the national mint, the Patent Office, revee
Decision in this case is the first time in a court in our nations history has hel that congress violated the appropriations clause by enacting a statute providing funding. This court should uphold the cfpbs funding statute because it is firmly grounded in constitutional text and in historical practice dating back to the founding. The text of the constitution shows that when the framers one to limit Congress Appropriations authority they did so expressly. While the framers restricted appropriationsor the army to two years, they applied no similar limits on appropriations for any other agency. History confirms that. Since the Founding Congress has consistently fundedgencies through standing appropriations that are not timelimited and that provide significant discretion over how much t spend. The First Congress did exactly this at the very first agency it create t customserce, and the same isru for of the founding era agencsncluding the post office, the national mint, the patent office, r
Decision in this case is the first time i a court in our nations hisry has held that congress violated the appropriationslause by enacting a statute providing funding. This court should uphold the cfpbs funding statute becau it is firmly grounded in constitutional text and in historical practice dating back to the founding. The text of the constitution shows that when the framers one to limit congress apopriations authority they did so expressly. While the framers restricted apopriations for the army to two years, they applied no similar limits on appropriations for any other agency. Hiory confirms that. Since the Founding Congress has consistely funded agencies through standing appropriations that are n timlimited and that provide significant discretion over how much to spend. The First Congress didxactly this at the very first agency it created the Customs Service, and the same i true for of the founding era agencies including the post office, the national mint, the Patent Office, re