Guy and the entire biden family operatioamion but n, but especiy joe biden, because today he announced the appointmentanns a Special Counsel to investigate possible hunterme crimes. But of course, he made no pre mention of president joe biden. Instead of appointing someone from outside of the government to lead this investigation, as by law, by the way,on is recommended under regulationn 28 c. F. R. 601. 3. Thanks to gregg jarrett, merriccsr k waved his magic wank and he just promotede david weiss. That is the same federal prosecutorsa , th, The One Who N been slow walking the criminal probe into Huntenter Bidr Bidenr several years. Hes the guy that allowed the statute of limitations to expire on multiple major felonies before majoe, of cours, then trying to put together that sweetheart, you kno w, little deal with hunter, no Jail Timane Ite and tie it up w, Neat Little Bow and, you know, h wover it all up. A Sweetheart Deal that Noejecte One Else will get. That, of course, rejected by
because there s an investigation going on, congress hasg, congr to stop. t it s the constitution, not. the statute that gives congress the right to investigate and investigate the executive authority. and they ought to continue their investigation and they ority anshouldought call garlan ought to call and say, why did you violate this regulation, ulo this regulation that has the imprimatur now of congress? why are you doing that?have and why did you make that deal? as i say, i predicted thisedicte all my book get trump the book. you talked about i allt in book i predicted each of these indictments, the new york indictment, a shambout. the the florida indictment strong on the facts, but on the law o and the d.c. indictment, weaksoi both on the law and on tha the facts. so, you know, i think congress has a verys important role to play, and that s especially the case since the sincee regu garland violated the regulations in appointinlag special people. all right. i really appreciate bot
whistleblowers also in a way, sobackdoor calling out merrick garland, the one guy that can protect both garland guy and the bidens. and david weiss,ns he s the guyn that s the one they pick. well, you knoe nt to w, i pru on your show that the sweetheart deal would no t be allowed to go through eventually. and we were vindicated today. that deal is now dead. they do want to conduct an investigation in the middle district of california. there may be new information that s coming out. but even if justice is done. the appearance of justice is not being done. ing donethe idea that wheninve the president s son is being investigated, you don stut follow rules and appoint somebody from outside from othe government is somethig that s just unexplainable. when you havexplainae high visie cases, you have to follow the rules to a tee. and if you don t, congress then has the right to inquire why. so i don t accept notion that
that. yeah. i mean, so what do you thinkea non: yeaw? i mean, what can we expect here? do you believe , as i suspect, that this special counsel who the doj approved to go before congress is now going to say, sorrapproveds noy it s g investigation, i m not going to be allowed to answer pretty muchoi pr any question you asked me today and that this now stonewall calls bothh the oversight committee investigation, alsoe ju the judiciary committee investigation of jim jordadin, because i believe that s part be. he strategy here i think that it will i can e imagine he s going to go s to congress and give substantive answers. but, you know, this won t work. it won t know, t work with the public and it won t work with the house of representatives. you know, they starting an apparent impeachment inquiry. ntthey have a right to pursueonf questions of corruption. and they re goin cg do it. jonathan turley, thank you. we appreciate it. when we come back, what didid joe biden know?
before congresnds. so garland picks the one guy i hit. the appointment of him is a shamngrecongre to me. what do you take? what do you make of the appointment of him in particulau e r? od they should have picked somebody that s independent. teshould have picked someon number one outside of the government. number two is already indicated. numberhe s. he s the one who put together a plea deal, sean, that t gave hunter immunity for the rest of his life, but then said the investigatioofn was continuing. why? so the congress, the republican house cannote vacatis investig. so he puts together a pleastigat deal. a federal judge will note. to go and then he comes back and he says after he saigo andd hadt all the power he needed to jim jordan but said in a meeting with the fbi and the irsa in october of 2022, i m nomeetin one making the decisions. and the u.s. attorney in d.cot i not giving me permission to prosecute in d.c. all youst e need to do is bring in the seven people who were at th