determinative of a woman s economic freedom and self determination is her ability to make her own decisions about when and if she has kids. if that becomes the government s decision, if that is no longer the station that women are allowed to make for themselves that fundamentally changes the economic and life and culture prospects for everyone in the country. i wonder if that stark truth about what this does to the future of american womanhood and the future of the american family, the future of who we are as a culture. if i might be enough to scare republicans and washington off an effort to do a nationwide ban. as you said, those trigger laws don t require any action. we ll just go into effect and more than 20 states. but we have reporting on the washington post that they want a nationwide, six, week flat ban. do you think that would be the dog that catches the car in that case?
about what this does to the future of american womanhood and the future of the american family, the future of who we are as a culture. if i might be enough to scare republicans and washington off an effort to do a nationwide ban. as you said, those trigger laws don t require any action. we ll just go into effect and more than 20 states. but we have reporting on the washington post that they want a nationwide, six, week flat ban. do you think that would be the dog that catches the car in that case? they may be too scared to actually do something that radical? or do you think they would just go for it? well, i mean, obviously, they are not going to be able to pass something like this in the senate right now, because democrats have the slim 50/50. but we have the majority. but i think what you re going to see is a discussion of this in real terms, like we ve never seen before. back alley abortions, people having to take buses to other states. people not being able, as you said, to make
recently been? if you re a swiss citizen and have gone to sudan, you re covered by the 2015 ban. precisely for the reason you re saying, judge hawkins. in 2015, congress determined there might be some security threats in sudan. what this does is says if you re a syrian and you re born in switzerland, spend your whole life in switzerland and then want to come to the united states, no. flat ban. just because of your nationality. that is not something that presidents have ever done in our lifetime. not quite as specific as judge hawkins suggestion, but the order does refer to conditions in the countries that are listed. why wasn t that sufficient for purposes of facial legitimacy? visa is to require visas, nothing more than that. i don t think it s detrimental to use judge gould s language, detrimental to the interest of