new details about the former trump advisor that wound up in custody overnight as the 16 committee gears up to make its evidence about the insurrection public. plus, the texan that wants to be her states next attorney general. why rochelle garza says ken paxton has to go. the nonstop of gun violence and massacres has taken a toll on the mental health of young people everywhere. this hour, on how we can all help them through it. this is america voices. we begin this hour with the supreme court in two cases that will shape our national debates on guns and abortions. the decision could come any day now, and they will show us who exactly what rights matter to conservative lawmakers. when it comes to guns, a supreme court challenge to who can carry and guns in public, stuck in dunk they law on what s states can do to restrict firearms and lead to more guns and credit paces. it will build on day 2008 heller decision that ruled the second amendment provides individual rights to
demanding to know what his gop colleagues would do on gun safety. he jumped the mic on their gaslighting in the prices. jones will join us live in studio. plus, democracy in danger. new details about the former trump advisor that wound up in custody overnight as the 16 committee gears up to make its evidence about the insurrection public. plus, the texan that wants to be her states next attorney general. why rochelle garza says ken paxton has to go. the nonstop of gun violence and massacres has taken a toll on the mental health of young people everywhere. this hour, on how we can all help them through it. this is america voices. we begin this hour with the supreme court in two cases that will shape our national debates on guns and abortions. the decision could come any day now, and they will show us who exactly what rights matter to conservative lawmakers. when it comes to guns, a supreme court challenge to who can carry and guns in public, stuck in dunk they law on what s st
podcasts. news continues on cnn with wolf blitzer, right externa place. i like to call the situation which win we ll see you tomorrow happening now and escalating campaign battle over immigration. as president biden orders, new protections for some undocumented spouses and children of us citizens and slams donald trump for fueling fears of immigrants, stand by two. here are trump is hitting back tonight also this hour and extraordinary seen in north korea as kim jong-un and braces without rebooting and gives him the red carpet treatment the us watching wearily as these adversaries of the west are cozying up and increasing their military cooperation at a moment of reckoning, that s what one senator is calling a tense hearing about growing worries over the safety of boeing jets. we re going to tell you how the testimony of boeing s ceo played with lawmakers and with relatives of crash victims who were there in the room welcome to our viewers in the united states and around th
Question. Why isnt adam schiff saying, yeah, lets go look at it . Instead just like yesterday when he said hell go look at it. Let me finish. He was almost about to sign the invitation for comey to come testify, but suddenly, there are stipulations. There was no reason to have stipulations. Same thing today. He was invited jack, youre rewriting jack, youre rewriting history. Stipulations, what are you saying let me answer the question. I know this not because ive talked to him, but because ive read the documents and read the public reporting which you can read as well and you probably already know, which is that he was willing to sign the letter. In fact, he said today, hes willing to have comey and rogers come in behind closeddoors testimony, but he also wants a guarantee that clapper, that yates, and others are going to testify openly and that hasnt been assured. Even today, he still hasnt gotten assurances from nunes thats going to occur. And jack, let me also ask you, if you were d
criminal consequences, ultimately. this is all pushing forward to thursday. first public hearings, we are all eagerly awaiting, ready to watch them. this committee, already, have done 1000 interviews at this point. they will have to pick and choose which witnesses they make part of these public hearings. from your vantage point, how do they make that choice? and this is where the term political theater becomes important. because these will be publicly aired hearings, you need to consider how the momentum will shift, in terms of democrats, and how they are perceived, with regards to the public watching them. because of that, they will, probably, look at the most explosive witnesses, or offer explicit testimony upfront. they need to justify the amount of time that they spend on the investigation. legally, that may not be the most exciting thing, but in