The staunch support for Israel has stoked accusations of American hypocrisy, with Arab critics fearing a wholesale massacre of Palestinians in response to the deadly Hamas attacks.
Other side, attorney harder tomorrow they just cave, they say we are dropping the case. we re out of this. there is no confidentiality agreement. we re gone. and the white house, president makes a they make a statement for him saying in order to get rid of this nuisance he has dropped all of the litigation and dropped any interest in this so-called agreement, which was michael cohen s agreement had nothing to do with the president. just get out of it by tomorrow. you disappear at this point, don t you? no. it s ta late. we have an affirmative claim now because today changed the case into a new case. right. it s not as if we woke up this morning and said we ll file a first amendment claim. we re chess players. i want to go back to something you said. i ve had the good fortune of representing some clients along the way that have had considerable means.
Tomorrow they just cave, they say we are dropping the case. we re out of this. there is no confidentiality agreement. we re gone. and the white house, president makes a they make a statement for him saying in order to get rid of this nuisance he has dropped all of the litigation and dropped any interest in this so-called agreement, which was michael cohen s agreement had nothing to do with the president. just get out of it by tomorrow. you disappear at this point, don t you? no. it s ta late. we have an affirmative claim now because today changed the case into a new case. right. it s not as if we woke up this morning and said we ll file a first amendment claim. we re chess players. i want to go back to something you said. i ve had the good fortune of representing some clients along the way that have had
More candidates, parties, and committees. you know, it s not about the government regulating itself. it s about our free speech outside the government and our political process outside the government to choose who is going to be in the government. all right, that was shaun mccutchen, the plaintiff in the case. kimberly on a legal issue before we get to politics, the supreme court was looking at a first amendment claim. why do you think he won? the first amendment claim, i think, is very interesting. what i would look at, the language of the justices because it s telling. you can also see future decisions, things by the language they re employing now. what struck me was when i hear these justices talk about the collective, talk about the greater good, the greater group like that, to me, then i start to worry if they re making decisions based on the right reasons versus on behalf of a collective. right? so you have both sides kind of shaping this argument, each way. one saying first
Are going to be able to support more candidates, parties, and committees. you know, it s not about the government regulating itself. it s about our free speech outside the government and our political process outside the government to choose who is going to be in the government. all right, that was shaun mccutchen, the plaintiff in the case. kimberly on a legal issue before we get to politics, the supreme court was looking at a first amendment claim. why do you think he won? the first amendment claim, i think, is very interesting. what i would look at, the language of the justices because it s telling. you can also see future decisions, things by the language they re employing now. what struck me was when i hear these justices talk about the collective, talk about the greater good, the greater group like that, to me, then i start to worry if they re making decisions based on the right reasons versus on behalf of a collective. right? so you have both sides kind of shaping this argum