we willjust listen in to these live pictures in manchester. so, that marks one minute, will everyone now please sit? in so, that marks one minute, will everyone now please sit? in this, the final open everyone now please sit? in this, the final open volume everyone now please sit? in this, the final open volume of- everyone now please sit? in this, the final open volume of my - everyone now please sit? in this, i the final open volume of my report, i the three topics. the radicalisation of salman abedi, the planning and preparation for the attack by salman abedi and hashim abedi, and whether it could have been prevented by counterterrorism policing. by hashem abedi. the role of the security service and the significance of the other two topics should not be underestimated. it is important that we understand as much as we can about the radicalisation of salman abedi so that similar signs can be recognised and appropriate action taken. it is also important that we know
Every level, before, during and after this horrific attack. even now, some families feel let down by the government s refusal to allow them to register their a loved 1 s death, which for some is a key part of the grieving process and is now wrongly being denied them. finally, we want to pay tribute to sirjohn saunders and the legal team for their unwavering determination to uncover the truth. we thank the inquiry support staff and the resilience hub for their support throughout. as this process now ends, we pay tribute to those who lost their lives. we also ask that our privacy is respected as we process the inquiry s findings. thank you. so they were the words of a lawyer representing 11 of the families and we can listen again. this
Communication between our services. we need a more efficient system in place we need a more efficient system in place to we need a more efficient system in place to ensure the different pieces of the place to ensure the different pieces of the jigsaw come together. we are not here of the jigsaw come together. we are not here to of the jigsaw come together. we are not here to point fingers. the bottom not here to point fingers. the bottom line is everyone who made mistakes, bottom line is everyone who made mistakes, every service that was lacking mistakes, every service that was lacking on mistakes, every service that was lacking on the night, every organisation who missed something in the lead organisation who missed something in the lead up organisation who missed something in the lead up to the attack is now aware the lead up to the attack is now aware of the lead up to the attack is now aware of their failings. this brings about aware of their failings. this
Was heard in secret, of the inquiry was heard in secret, effectively, only heard by the witnesses, sirjohn saunders, and the legal representatives. no public allowed in, nojournalists out the legal representatives. no public allowed in, no journalists out to watch, no families allowed in to hear the evidence taking place, effectively to protect the official secrets of how the mis, british security services, how they operate and who works for them, and that evidence, although heard by the chairman of the inquiry, he will be restricted in some ways about what he can now say beyond that. so he will give his report, knowing what has said in the past, chapters inquiry, you will be relatively forthright and. i’m inquiry, you will be relatively forthright and. . . inquiry, you will be relatively forthright and. i m afraid i m “ust forthright and. i m afraid i m just going forthright and. i m afraid i m just going to forthright and. i m afraid i m just going to interrupt - forthright
And he s been speaking at the publication of the third and final report into the deaths of the 22 victims of the 2017 attack carried out by suicide bomber salman abedi and today s report considers how salman abedi was radicalised and any security services had to stop him. let your now from sirjohn saunders. what i have been able to set out from volume three is that a significant opportunity was missed to take preventative action it may have stopped the attack. that to take preventative action it may have stopped the attack.- to take preventative action it may have stopped the attack. that is not a conclusion have stopped the attack. that is not a conclusion on have stopped the attack. that is not a conclusion on the have stopped the attack. that is not a conclusion on the balance - have stopped the attack. that is not a conclusion on the balance of - a conclusion on the balance of probabilities or to any other standard that whether the attack may have been prevented but there was