[inaudible] on the submittal due date which was may 31, we received seven proposals we had proposals. The first step in the process was to review each proposal for compliance for qualifications. All seven proposals, that we received, met the qualifications area the next that was to review the cmd forms and make sure they met the lbe requirements. Again, they all met the requirements. The proposals had to score 45 points or more to be invited to the next phase. Five of the seven firms scored over 75 points and were invited to the next phase. The oral interviews were also worth 100 points. The most qualified respondents were the top two firms. This light shows the final top. We therefore recommend contract award to the top three scoring firm which are esa cdim venture, sca environmental and aew engineering. They have not been any project through regarding evolution. We have here with us, some representation from the winning teams. [please stand by] commissioners, this slide shows the l.
All outfitted, they are 1 million apiece. V. P. Covington thank you. I think it would be helpful to have a photograph of the hose tinders for our next eating, if you could . Thank you for that. Lets see. We need 20 . That would be another 15 million. Okay. I think this is going to be a topic of an ongoing discussion. I wanted to know, how long has it been since there was the the chief of health, safety and wellness, that you are proposins other entity that you said had gone dormant for a while. The health check we stopped doing it three years ago. Again, there was issues with information transferred from the unit and the agreements on how that information was there. We are bringing her back again with the benefits of members, knowing what their issues are. V. P. Covington those issues where privacy issues . Yes. The information when they received it they would go to our doctor, or did . In our opinion what we need is raw data. What types of issues, stress or whatever it is we are exper
Once again, thank you, again for all of your great work on this. We really appreciate it. Supervisor mandelman thank you again. Next speaker. Im ed gershin. Our actions are going to need to include Large Capital investments. When we say things like large transit for boats cant be addressed, we need to make sure that we have the p. R. Necessary in San Francisco to address those challenges. Also, in terms of housing policy, we need to be conscious that landlords may not be incentivized upgrade to renewable energy, and we need to either mandates or incentives to make sure that landlords are also upgrading the apartments that they control when its the tenants that pay for that. Also, we need to be cognizant of the land use of San Francisco and untalso of peopl that may not move to San Francisco because of those policies. And also, we need to have a lot of trees and ensure we have a sufficient tree canopy in San Francisco. Supervisor mandelman thank you. Next speaker. Hello. Im josh lee. Iv
Second thing going on, which is we are taxing a mode of transportation that is shown to create congestion and using that money to fund modes of transportation that could reduce transportation. There is an economic benefit. Unfortunately, the first of phnom economic impact, with the data to analyse, and the second we dont. When i say, as we conclude in the report, that this is a mildly negative economic impact. That is a result of placing the tax on the consumers and spending the money at the city. It is a fairly small impact of 25 milliondollar reduction to the g. D. P. , which is less then the tax that is raised. We are not able, because of Data Limitations to estimate how responsive t. N. C. Ridership would be to be an increase in fares, although we expected to decline somewhat. The only kind of caveat that we mentioned in our report is about the proposed tax and it also includes Autonomous Vehicles. At present, there are no Autonomous Vehicles doing rides in San Francisco. The case
Supervisor peskin 1184 was the assembly bill, which senator wiener got out of the senate side. This has actually been a collaborative project. I think we all know with homelessness and 3. 25 for normal t. N. C. Rides, 1. 5 for pooled rides, and offers incentives for rides at the pooled rate. This has been a collaborative effort with uber and lyft, and i want to publicly thank and acknowledge my chief of staff, son i sonny angulo. Many are supportive of this as it will bring 30 millionplus annually for bike and Infrastructure Improvements and other ways to get cars off the streets and provide residents with safe alternative Transportation Options to cars. With that, i have several amendments. Page 1, lines 7 and 8 and 9. They have the same changes. Page 4, line 8, strike human operator and replace with natural person. Page 4, line 10, insert remotely after driven and replace remote driver with natural person. Page 4, lines 11 through 15, insert commercial Ride Share Company means a pers