afternoon, we got a whole bunch of receipts. this is the new document filing. if you follow the news you may have heard it s coming. and today you may have seen reports on it here in today s news coverage. well, we have it. the filing is big, billion dollar plus case against fox news. that s the defamation case against fox by one of the voting machine companies. why is this a stop story in the nation? because as partly expected, there are more new original bombshell revelations i m going to go through with you now before i bring in our experts, including rupert murdoch, admitting things under oath that he doesn t admit when he s not brought into a courtroom looking at a fine. he admits select fox hosts completely endorsed the lie about donald trump and the election. murdoch asked under oath whether some of the hosts endorsed the big lie that the election was stolen that he didn t actually lose, and murdoch replies yes, they endorsed. and that s not all. under oath we find a v
releasing the search warrant itself. the doj arguing the road map was too sensitive to be released. citing witness protection and ongoing investigation. the doj lost that argument today. the judge finding that those prosecutors failed to meet the burden to prove the entire of adate should remain sealed, ordering the garland doj to file their secret proposed redactions within a week. so that s a loss for them on process and a win for getting more information about this operation, as a general citizen, if you are interested in learning even more about what s going on there, well, that s a win. most news outlets wanted the outcom outcome. trump also wanted that outcome. he went from hiding the original warrant, which he had the whole time, then saying he wanted it released, then the judge releasing some new materials as well today like more of the warrant application with sites he illegally possessed contrabrand at mar-a-lago. it is in early stages as they review the evidence th
In like fashion, we have no confidence in their ability to handle and we think they have misread the law. as you heard me start to say, you get to make that point. the rico conspiracy statute is at the center of this very case, and that brings us all full circle, because defendant trump as we mentioned has replaced that lawyer who was working as early as this week, findling with steve sato, known critic of georgia s rico laws, and like mr. findling he has experience with what findling mentioned. he represented the new lawyer, gunna, a rico defendant who s now out along an other artists like rick ross, t.i., and usher. atlanta is known for plenty of things, cultural contributions. has also had its share of crime, rico, and gang problems. the criminal bar has this experience, the prosecutors have this experience, and it s all
Georgia law is different than other jurisdictions. the deliberations of the grand jury, the fruits of at at least, belong to the georgian people and therefore the theory goes, she s able to talk about it. that s a far crime from trump being able to make something of this. of course he s going to attack the grand jury is rigged. when he loses in the grand jury, he s going to attack the election is rigged. his hair blue the wrong way, the weather is rigged. that s just his playbook. will it be successful as a legal challenge? i think the answer so undoubtedly no. even if she did something wrong, and that s a big if, it doesn t benefit trump because trump would have to slow unfair publicity, and that standard is unbelievably high. mr. findling is one of the lawyers who have been detailing trump s criminal defense.