perhaps members will consider how the select committee s true intentions dealing with mr. meadows have been revealed, citing the documents his cooperation has produced. he heard them cite those documents last night and again this morning. finally meadows lawyer s statement asks, what message does that send to him as well as to others who might be inclined to consider cooperating in good faith? when meadows is arguing for executive privilege because he has done things like put out a book and provide them with these messages, they would like the opportunity to ask him questions about these. there are also questions about if because some of these messages and e-mails were sent on private devices, whether or not they were turned over to the national archives in compliance with the national records act. they did just have a ruling in their favor last week.
needs to tell people in the capitol to go home. this is hurting all of us. he is destroying his legacy. laura ingram wrote. as the violence continued, one of the president s sons texted mr. meadows, quote, he s got to condemn this [ bleep ] asap. the capitol police tweet is not enough, donald trump jr. texted. meadows responded, quote, i m pushing it hard, i agree. donald trump jr. texted again and again, urging action by the president. quote, we need an oval office address. he has to lead now. it has gone too far and gotten out of hand. so david, just on that, what are the questions for meadows? he knows what he did about those texts. i think what this does is paint a picture of how