outside its borders. with distance comes clarity. so with that in mind, here is salvadoran president niyi bucheli on twitter today, quote, think what you want about former president trump and the reasons he s being indicted, bucheli wrote . but just imagine if this happened in any other country where a government arrested the main opposition candidate, the united states s ability to use democracy as foreign policy is gone. thousands of miles from new york city, in the heart of central america, it is very obvious what just happened at that manhattan courthouse. it s obvious to many democrats to trump was criminally charged because he is planning to challenge joe biden in the upcoming presidential election. it s really that simple. if donald trump had retired in 2020, would he have been arraigned today? of course not. top democrats know that some effectively admitted the liberal blog politico this morning ran a piece describing what it called president joe biden s most seni
the lens of orangeman that we have to care about law and due process. and anyone that does can quickly see that what we have here, abuse of a political system to manipulate an election. and if you doubt that, if you doubted it, just beyond seeing the weakness of the case, i give you that the prosecution asked for their trial date to be january twenty twenty four . right when primaries start. yes. this is a political persecution . it s not about the politicians that are old, but some of us have kids and they re going to have to live here in a system that we want to function. we ll thank you so much. thanks, tucker. harmeet dhillon is obviously a famous civil rights attorney . she s highly familiar with this case. and we have to ask, why did a judge allow cameras into the court to take pictures of trump? normally you see sketches that seemed like part of a strategy, a political strategy, not a legal one . army film. thank you for coming on . what did you make of that? well, i agr
pharmaceutical industry to force the most extensive treatment instead of doing something that would save the most lives and cost the least disruption. tucker: as long as you are not criticizing pfizer, which i don t think is allowed anymore. i appreciated. j.d. nance, great to see you. harmeet dhillon, the famous civil rights attorney, directly involved in this case and represent and the client was fighting against the vaccine mandate. harmeet dhillon is with the center for american liberties and joins us tonight to explain the latest. thank you for coming on. where do you think this is going? i think there may be a split ruling out of the court. i think on the case where i am representing the daily wire, challenging the large employer mandate, it looks like we have five or six votes to enjoin that order but on the one regarding medical facilities, because the order is tied to federal funding, i think there are some different arguments there and the justices seem more likely to uph
conspired with the pharmaceutical industry to force the most extensive treatment instead of doing something that would save the most lives and cost the least disruption. tucker: as long as you are not criticizing pfizer, which i don t think is allowed anymore. i appreciated. j.d. nance, great to see you. harmeet dhillon, the famous civil rights attorney, directly involved in this case and represent and the client was fighting against the vaccine mandate. harmeet dhillon is with the center for american liberties and joins us tonight to explain the latest. thank you for coming on. where do you think this is going? i think there may be a split ruling out of the court. i think on the case where i am representing the daily wire, challenging the large employer mandate, it looks like we have five or six votes to enjoin that order but on the one regarding medical facilities, because the order is tied to federal funding, i think there are some different arguments there and the justices seem