supreme court says about it. so meadows would be the second person held in contempt if the full house agrees. how do you think the justice department will act? i think this is a pretty straightforward case because of meadows wholesale refusal to show up. he has non-privileged testimony that the committee wants. and notwithstanding any good faith disagreements about executive privilege protected communications. there is a whole host of information that the committee has set forth that they want from meadows. and when he refused entirely to show up, i think he acted in contempt of congress. and i think that the d.o.j. can bring a charge against him, setting aside the executive privilege disagreement, and saying his conduct is legally contemptuous because he refused to answer questions about non-privileged information, information that he, as we ve discussed, he has already given