and to be shunned. i think that s part of what it is. you see the same thing with journalism. where media cite the splc hate group designation as a fact. the person is this old and wearing a blue suit and he hasti been designated as a hate group by the splc. that is starting to change because they really have overreached. they have gotten slapped down a couple of times.th there was a muslim reformer, liberal muslim anti-extremist. they labeled him extremist. he sued. they settled because they knew they would lose for $3 million plus. i don t expect them to go that easily in this case but i think we have a pretty strong case. tucker: you have a very vstrong case. i looked at the accusations they leveled against you because you are a guest on the show and i was interested. there is no basis saying it t about you. shocking. i think it s libel. we are rooting for you, of course.sh thank you. tucker: new report exposes google for blacklisting certain video searches on youtube. you can
affluent progressives on the coast love him best.de he is one of them. in the betting markets, o rourke is the favorite to win the democratic nomination. two years from now he plausibly could be in the oval office. so it s work taking beto o rourke seriously. what kind of president would he be? at this point we can only guess. we know like most people in his social class he is totally against border walls. we will fought when necessary against a president focused on building walls. no wall is going to solve legitimate security concerns. then perhaps you can be forgiven thinking that a wall will solve the problem. we in el paso are ashamed of this now. but this is one of those moments where the folks in germany look back on the berlin wall or the united states looks back on the project to intern japanese americans in world war ii. tucker: did you hear that? berlin wall, bad. border wall, also bad. indeed, bad, very much like
it s not putting them them at a massive risk and potentially killing them. tucker: if we erect a wall and say you can t cross, that s the same as killing them? putting up a wall puts them in danger because it forces them to find different point of entry. s the wall is a massive, it doesn t accomplish anything orem solve the problem of immigration, longer visas, people overstaying the visas. tucker: i m glad you put that out there. that is totally fair. that is a talking point but it s real so i m glad you mentioned it. mr. o rourke was asked it, too, by jeff bezos newspaper. his quote was i don t know.uo how can you not know? he represents texas. he has been asked about immigration for years and he hasn t thought of the visa overstays as you point out is a driver of the crisis. how can he not have an answer to that? out of context that sounds bad, but what he said after that was that he would work with the people affected by, work with policymakers, work with experts, work wit
outcome. tucker: i don t see how under the circumstances all things being equal, donald trump could get reelected. i don t. under the circumstances, they won t have that. i wonder why the white house, they do control the executive branch of government. why they wouldn t have been awakened to that. we have seen donald trump tweet about this issue in september of 2018, frank of the subject matter of today s story from breitbart and people called him a conspiracy theorist, that it isn t true and now we see the evidence that actually they are doing this manipulation and that they lie to congress about it. but these companies skillfully spread the money around, not just to members of congress, but alsoho people working in the administration were looking for their exit and thinking maybe i will work on the other side of tech policy and make a bunch of money advising google on how to speak conservative. tucker: it s scary. vladimir putin is a much smaller threat to united states than go
with political ends. number two, this tells us that the google c.e.o. committed perjury when he testified before congress a few weeks ago. because he said quite specifically that google never does this. tucker: so i mean, my frustration levels are so high i don t want to take it on you but the first thought is why isn t he being recalled back to congress to explain himself or face charges? because you are not allowed commit perjury. but my question is, in any of us trust that the next election mon t be swayed dramatically in one direction by interference from the tech companies? i guarantee you that this past election was affected. i ll be releasing some data on this i hope in early march. that will make the point beyond any doubt. i also just published a piece in which i showed that just one manipulation on google s part on