just to be clear, senator turnpike ascertained cruz doesn t know that, okay. he s just asserting that. there s been a lot of talk on the right about whoever leaked this decision must be a liberal. but there are a lot of bread crumbs that indicate otherwise. back on april 26, six days before the decision was leaked, the wall street journal, published out of nowhere, out of nowhere, this editorial advocating for the supreme court to overturn roe v wade. but looking back, it sure seems to have a real insider look at the courts decision making. in fact, they write that she this is done or seem to be pushing for middle ground that would not totally be eviscerated roe. saying, quote, if you pose another justices side, he can write the parietal erupting that controls in the 63 decision. if he can t, then justice thomas would ve signed opinion and the vote can be five for. our guess is that justice alito would then get the assignment. well that s a real lucky guess. where is all that coming
Advocating for the supreme court to overturn roe. but looking back, it sure seems to have a real insider look at the courts decision making. in fact, they write that she this is done or seem to be pushing for middle ground that would not totally be eviscerated roe. saying, quote, if you pose another justices side, he can write the parietal erupting that controls in the 63 decision. if he can t, then justice thomas would ve signed opinion and the vote can be five for. our guess is that justice alito would then get the assignment. well that s a real lucky guess. where is all that coming from? where is all this inside knowledge of what the jockeying is around this decision? which, again, listen to tread cruise, is sacrilege. so, the wall street journal guesses, he did get the assignment, and those not public knowledge. they continue, quote, roberts may be trying to turn another justice now. we ll be doesn t succeed, for