years. we re breaking down his objective and what it means in the united states. todd: silicon valley is flipping the switch and supp supporting live to tell us why she is crossing the aisle. carley: this is how you celebrate a u.s. open win. b bryson dechambeau getting a special message from a certain former president. you have everything else, you are the closest thing we ve seen to arnold palmer. carley: you are watching fox and friends first, i m carley shimkus. high praise. todd: i ve seen you drink wine, only out of the claret jug. carley: don t we all. f todd: fox news alert. carley: biden administration sharing new details on plan to grant mass amnesty for illegal immigrants married to u.s. citizens. todd: more clarity on who is crossing into our country. madeleine rivera has details. madeleine: good morning, biden administration says it is to make it easier for migrants to get permanent legal status would you tell us having to leave the countr
News up the chain of command is working against putin right now if that he seems to believe things are going better than they are, and he must, i don t know, blaming the captain of the moskva from that going down. there are a lot of generals already killed on the battlefield. he can t blame any more. eight. there have been eight general ralls. this is the isolation of dictators that leads to their decision-making brittle and isolated. the term of the scenario is sometimes called escalate to deescalate. in terms of the strategic response, what has been tkpwaeupld out? what is considered a best practice escalate to deescalate in this nightmare scenario. let me give you an interesting scenario. knee jerk would be respond in
Need breathing space otherwise we re prepared to go the next step. i think we in media by saying this is esscalatory esscalatory is different, dangerous, and for those who say this is we need to mask it they use the word escalate to deescalate. assuming that is part of russian doctrine, that is not in any russian doctrine, that is from 2015, american arm services committee hearing, when they were asked to summarize what the doctrine was a russian military doctrine published 3 years prior, it made its way to u.s. nuclear review as a way of
Jon: any chance putin loses power as a result of this invasion? yes. there are large elements of russian society which are being disvarnged and believe russia s policy is not work. a tweet by marco rubio indicates that putin s position is unstable. although we don t know the full details of that, because it s a non-transparent regime. we can assume there is a lot of infighting at the kremlin. that means vladimir putin has a low threshold of risk. which means he can do something to surprise us, including use his nuclear weapons. their doctrine is to deescalate to escalate. we should be object a much higher level of alert right now. jon: gordon, thank you.