230 around content i think has it is very complicated because user generated content is something that companies have less control over. they have 100% control over their algorithms. and facebook should not get a free pass on choices it makes to prioritize growth and virality and reactiveness over public safety. they shouldn t get a free pass on that. they re paying for their profits now with our safety. so i strongly encourage reform of 230. now, the stated folks at the hearing was protecting kids online, spurred by internal facebook research showing that it knew instagram could be toxic for young girls with body image issues. so you agree that congress has to enact the special protections for children and teens to stop social media companies from manipulating young users and threatening their well-being. tell me if this should pass, one, create an online eraser button so young users can tell
because it was already their business model. bewe need to update that law for the 21st century. tell me if this should pass. one, create an online eraser button so that young users can tell websites to delete the data they ve collected about them. two, give young teens under the age of 16 and their parents control of their information. and three, ban targeted ads to children. i support all those actions. thank you. and finally, i ve also introduced the algorithmic justice and online transparency act, which would one, open the hood on facebook and big tech s algorithms so we know how facebook is using our data to decide what content we see and two, ban discriminatory algorithms that harm vulnerable
tucker: yeah. we know it affects kids ability to read and retain information and to think clearly. so is there any legislative effort to pull back or are we just passive in the face of a threat to our children? no, no, actually, tucker, there s a lot of good stuff coming on this kind of issue. there s stuff here on the west coast in terms of looking at addiction research that needs to be done around social media platforms. much greater privacy concern now. a number of different legislative efforts to try to either encourage or require companies to respect the young kids in their audience and that will grow. we passed a bill called the eraser button here in california a couple years ago so that kids made dumb decisions can erase them. you ll see a growing public outcry. while you re covering it helps as well. tucker: i hope so. i can see them marketing to babies how to crawl.
before posted something on social media and regretted it. what if you had an eraser button. it let s deteenagers deleting posts giving them a do over. wnyw dan bowens explains. we don t really think things through. everybody makes mistakes. there are some things want to leave in the past. from that epic skate boarding fail to the awkward prom propos proposal, and millions of moments in between, the internet is full of instances many teens would rather forget. somebody posts dumb things. chelsea cross knows erasing them from the internet is not easy. they are care free and fun. that one picture can come back to haunt you. for teens in california achieving a clean state may be getting a bit simpler.
man. get down with the youth. she had an eraser button. she should have cut her finger off. that would have been permanent. that s awful. there are kids watching. that would have been punk. yes, it would have been. i kid. the big law bow ski. no that was a toe. thanks, rick. bill, during the super bowl half time show last year you were outside the stadium turning tricks for bags of inhalable methane. who is the siner here? i guess i am. i agreed we wouldn t talk about this on air, but i did not have a contract with the nfl. i guess i get why they are doing this, but $1.5 million? and the thing that turned me around to be team mia because i am a friend. we yolo a lot. they want to do the public