Premise of the question, yes google was Hiding Informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led byo a noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. He did this in one swoop bye organizing a letter to the Land Standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronaviru
we re t going to take it under consideration on the show and see if we can do that . but in all honesty, on behalfbe of everybody on this network, you ll phenomenal job.u you need a conservative or liberal. you re asking questions that need to be asked and you are fair in your questioningt and the fact that they don tto want to answer them is a whole different story. n. let me move on . we have problems with inflation. we have problems with gas prices. we have problems with ukraine. we have problems still with at the border and covid mixwh messaging. why do you y think there s soou much confusion? you re there every day. i mean, there are smart peoplee in the white house. control of all of this ? well, you thinkel aboutl, what s president said when he wasr running for election. e he said that if he won, he wanted to transfer form the country and it s tough to transform the country into this greenen vision that you hae where you re combating climate change and there s more equityco when
Premise of the question, yes google was Hiding Informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led byo a noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. He did this in one swoop bye organizing a letter to the Land Standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronaviru
Premise of the question, yes google was Hiding Informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led byo a noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. He did this in one swoop bye organizing a letter to the Land Standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronaviru
Premise of the question, yes google was Hiding Informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led byo a noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. He did this in one swoop bye organizing a letter to the Land Standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronaviru