maxwell did not act alone. i have faith they will be. thank you for being here and your excellent coverage. count two where maxwell was found not guilty? we knew the jurors were tripped up on something discussing something behind the scenes and our only glimpse was were there jury notes? they asked a couple questions related to that enticement count and asked for what the definition of enticement was. they asked for the transcripts for jane, who that charge was regarding and they also asked for travel logs. they asked for testimony from two of the former epstein pilots to be sent back to them, as well. so in all, they asked for more than a dozen transcripts of testimony. almost a third of the witnesses. clearly the jurors took their
why was this the count they akitakit quitted on? what is clear is the jury did credit and believe these victims. their testimony was powerful and believable. the enticement count is one that ended up in the not guilty verdict and it could be the jury got caught up on what does it mean to entice? cause somebody to doincentive, financial or other. it was jeffrey epstein doing the enticing and maxwell was the transporter and accomplice. either way, i want to be clear the fact that that one count ended up with a not guilty verdict will have no impact on the bottom line sentence. she is looking at a heavy sentence and justifiably so given the evidence. of course, they did ask about that enticement definition. one of the notes for the judge. this was an issue in that respect. joey, look, you re a defense attorney and a long line of defendants in the past few months, let alone year, you ve