someone has to take the stand to explain what was going on through one of their minds at the time the ennis dernt occurred. the attorneys get together to figure out which might be the best person to articulate that and demonstrate the fear. the attorneys decided travis mcmichael was best suited to do that. as we saw from that blistering cross-examination, you know, there were some points that were made by the state clearly and it was a risk. and i think that in the end the gamble might not have paid off. she clearly drove home the point that they had the trucks. they had the gun. they were chased him. they were the people chasing toward him. they were the aggressors. she made that point pretty vividly. in your state of wisconsin, the jury is still deliberating over kyle rittenhouse. next week is a short week with the holidays. what do you think of the fact there hasn t been a verdict yet? do we make anything of that? why does the judge letting a juror take the instructions home