people brace for another potential indictment of donald trump, it could come today, could come in two days. it could come in two weeks. the secretive nature of these proceedings means your guess on the time of any indictment is as good as ours. we do know for sure that while the grand jury hearing evidence and testimony in the january 6th investigation has been meeting on tuesdays and thursdays, so far they have not met today. you don t know what that means but we share it anyway. in the meantime jack smith appears to have already navigated his way through many of what could be primary witnesses in potential criminality in the lead up and on january 6th. take richard donohue who we mentioned an essential voice related to the prosecution of the aftermath of the november 2020 election. what trump told him to do is to essentially fraudulently overturn a u.s. election without any evidence. he wanted his ceo jay brass to publicly, quote, just say the election was corrupt and then
good evening to you, i am sara sidner, welcome to cnn tonight. the grand jury investigating donald trump and his allies were efforts to up and joe biden s election victory, it s expected to meet again tomorrow cnn exclusively learning prosecutors are asking witnesses about a never forward oval office meeting in february 2022. what donald trump praised election security protections. then just a few weeks later started spreading all this voter fraud conspiracy theory. what else has jack smith learned? and will it lead to trump s third indictment? that is tomorrow s news, tonight. also ahead for you, a momentous time in u.s. history, finally getting its due, president joe biden expected to sign a proclamation tomorrow establishing a national monument honoring emmett till and his mother maybe till-mobley, on what would have been emmitt s 82nd birthday. till was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered at the age of 14, in 1955. his death shocked america, it also helped fuel the ci
the case that can change the course of the election. nine justices are ironing their robes, as we speak. tonight on laura coates live. and just a few short hours from now, the supreme court of the united states will hear arguments in a historic effort to ban former president trump on the ballot for his alleged role in the january six insurrection. we ll be able to listen i tomorrow morning. let me make it easy for you to follow their conversation tomorrow. you ve been hearing a lot about the 14th amendment. it s not the center of the case before the supreme court tomorrow. now, it has five sections. of the five, you may only know section one, the one about due process, attention to laws, that one. that is not what we are talking about tonight. it s the other white me, section three. that s what s so important. the so-called insurrectionists clause. at its core, it says, you can t hold office if you engaged in insurrection. if it were that easy, i would not have to explain, it
nightmare. she screamed and she yelled an she cried, it was terrible did she fell down the steps? no one was thinking someone di this to her, but did someone d this to her. it just unraveled from tha moment on. the fashionista with re lipstick she meant the world to me. when she walked into the roo it was like a movie star walke in corporate executive, caring mom, 1 million dollar smile an a 4 million dollar estate. oh my god, i need a ambulance. murdered. i went screaming out of the house. this was a prominent woman, murdered in her home, late a night. almost certainly someone sh knew correct where would it lead a twisted case of betrayal and greed. the fingers being pointed a me her own daughter of suspect from the start you pulled the knife out an you tell the police oh you are going to find my fingerprint on the knife her son in law who seemed s devoted. they interrogated us fo eight hours. or maybe someone else with million dollar motive.
tampering. cnn s ryan nobles starts off our coverage this morning. reporter: new information about the january 6 committee s star witness cassidy hutchinson. sources tell cnn that hutchinson was one of the two examples that liz cheney used to show trump s allies were putting pressure on former staffers to stay loyal to the former president . our committee commonly asks witnesses whether they have been contacted by any of their former colleagues or anyone else who attempted to influence or impact their testimony. reporter: witness intimidation among the growing list of potential crimes the committee believes trump and his top advisers could be at the center of. it is a very serious issue and i would imagine the department of justice would be very interested in and would take that very seriously as well. reporter: but trump and his allies are pushing back, attacking hutchinson and questioning clerd redibility. meanwhile the committee issuing a subpoena to pat cipollon