of messages and depositions from fox news hosts, senior executives and employees as part of a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit. these documents show the depth of the contempt many at fox news had for the truth and frankly for their own viewers. prime time host laura ingraham blasted the fox news decision desk for something that every other normal reputable news organization in the country values, for being accurate. from the new york times, quote, ms. ingraham said the work of the decision desk was an inside job intended to sabotage conservative hosts like her, quote, we are all officially working for an organization that hates us she fumed. the messages show that host sean hannity responded to that, quote, why would anyone defend that call, referring to the decision desk s highly accurate and early election night projection that president joe biden would go on to win arizona. no, sean and laura were not alone. from the washington post reporting on these new filings, quote
House republican caucus. and how much of your understanding having been inside doj, having worked at doj, do you think any of these members should be scrutinized criminally? jack smith has proven he s going to look under every rock and open every toor for relevant thfgs. and no person is sort of carved out from or exempt from that investigation. our investigation showed that there were members of congress who were in direct communication with the president and his legal team about the alternate electors theory, whether the vice president is would send back slates of electors or accept these. i think the special counsel will examine that entire course of dealing in the course of making decisions. my guess is they are focused on
Much to avoid contempt unlike maybe steve bannon but i don t think that we have seen anything akin to full cooperation and i also true about stephen miller s testimony today. maybe he told the truth. the committee singled him out for a role in this slate of electors theory. mill every thinks he is a lawyer yet knows nothing about the law. he knows squat about it. always attracted to the most bogus interpretation of the law particularly to enhance donald trump s powers. he s exactly the guy that james madison in federalist 51 warned against. a man not an angel. he is the guy who tried to keep the phone records secretz from the committee for a long time and the rational is that he was on a family plan and the search