Says that the president has the First Amendment right to speech. Yes. Even the First Amendment right to lie. Absolutely. This indictment is criminalizing conduct not speech. Its criminalizing speech. Why the randomly incised judge is bad news for the defendant. The complicated calendar of republican front runner facing three criminal trials and congressman jamie raskin on jack smiths decision to charge civil rights law used to prosecute kkk violence. Check out detroit. Check out when all in starts, right now. Good in a few new york. Im chris hayes. For the third time in four months, donald trump will be arrested and arraigned tomorrow. And a federal courthouse in washington, d. C. Hes got to be getting used to it by now. He will stand for a federal magistrate judge. He will enter a plea as he has done in the last two cases. In this new Criminal Case laid out against him for attempting to steal the 2020 election. Tomorrow he will be returning to the scene of that crime, as laid out in t
nothing is more squarely in that latter character gory than the fake electors plot. i have been buried in the details, like many of you have, of january 6th, lead up, the aftermath, in this indictment contains the most detailed revelations about that specific conspiracy. the fake electors conspiracy is a plot we have seen in state after say, seven total, and the facts aren t in dispute. some of them are publicly broadcasted in realtime at the time. but crucially, to go back to the defense, the president s lawyer, ex president s lawyer is trying to mount, they basically have nothing to do a speech because all of this was kind of done behind the scenes. in some instances, i would in the wide open. but what is described in the fake electors scheme crucially s conduct, actions. jack smith sums it up simply in the tail of the name of the details the plot. here it is, quote. trump s use of dishonesty,