opinion suggesting it was ready to turn the abortion statute roe v. wade. question, why exactly are democrat leaders dragging their feet when it comes to protecting judges and their families? there was absolutely no excuse not to provide that protection for all the justices. republican minority in the senate needs to push back and make sure those in charge of the law protecting our judges, somebody is going to get killed here if we don t change this. there is only one reason for protestors to show up outside the home of a public figure. to send a message we know where you live. we shouldn t be playing with this. we re playing with fire. harris: david spunt live at the justice department. we found out from the capitol hill producer the house actually will not likely be taking up a vote on protecting justices and their families today. the house is off tomorrow. so we may not see any action on this until next week with further will enrage people to make sure that judge
who did she reject? congressman jim banks, a distinguished afghanistan veteran. she rejected congressman jim jordan, the ranking and maybe soon to be chair of judiciary committee. now why she rejected these qualified republicans, she appointed radical democrats. you ever spend time to see who is on it? she appointed chairman thompson who to be clear objected to the presidential electors in 2005. she appointed congressman raskin who also objected to the presidential elect tors in 2017. let s not forget what else he said. he called for president trump s impeachment not during his term in office, but between when he was elected and being sworn in.
this is simply what tips the scale and they push him out. isa? we shall wait for that sue gray report. i know you ll stay on top of it. keep us posted. selma abdel azeez outside 10 downing street. thanks, selma. turning to a cnn exclusive. federal prosecutors are reviewing electoral college certificates from states that trump lost. they were signed by trump supporters who claimed to be the rightful elect tors in georgia, arizona and five other states. here s what the deputy told cnn. we are going to follow the facts and the law wherever they lead to discuss conduct at any
fifth amendment as to those claims. it s important to understand what it does and does not protect jeffrey clark from. henao cannot be charged with criminal contempt if he takes the fifth because that s a legally valid basis to not answer questions. however, he can still be charged with any other crimes he may have committed around january 6th. they just won t have his own statement to use against him. if he s trying to protect himself from incriminating himself, what are the specific crimes he could have committed? boy, do i have a list here. let s remember what jeffrey clark did. he wrote a memo when he was one of the highest ranking members of doj saying we have detected significant potential election fraud in georgia. you ought to call a special election and appoint a different slate of elect tors. that s fraud . it s a crime to conspire to defraud the united states of a free and fair election. so jeffrey clark does
our apologies. yes. okay. i have been talking to folks who reject donald trump answnonald president-elect and hanging hopes, as you are, that december 19th electors can change this, actually go against what we ve seen in the past, faceless electors they are called, and i wonder why do you think that is a good idea? well, you know, we believe that the hamilton elect tors there s a failed there to deliberate and have 34 days to come around a we the people candidate. we the people republican candidate. we understand that there s many issues, the electoral college and seeking for electoral reform, but s by opening up a dialogue question start to speak and reach across the aisle to everybody, because overwhelmingly i think people in