Right? first of all, i couldn t start my car around i blamed president trump and i hit a lot of potholes on the way to work. i thought he was going to make america great again. in the city, it s been shut down by snow. every story has to be about trump and many stories have to portray donald trump as being on the brink of disaster. i want to bring something to your attention, something this appeared in the washington post. there was a headline about vandalism that had occurred at president trump s golf course. initially the headline read i m trying to look at it it said it was daring act of defiance. that was in the original headline. they changed it. let me say what they changed it to. it changed into, an elaborate act of vandalism. the editor put in a note saying the story was changed to more accurately reflect the nature of
Trump during the campaign. all of which is demonstrably true. i think that s accurate on the merits, you are right. but the rnc as i remember during the campaign reserved over a million dollars of space, signed a contract with buzzfeed, why would the rnc do business with and irresponsible left-wing blog that was hostile to its candidate? great question. let me just be clear, the buzzfeed story that was posted last night, its editor put as a footnote that they were unsure of the information that they were putting out and it should be taken with caution because it was unsubstantiated. to be clear about the stories that they publish themselves. we get to the question about the campaign, we reserve time across 56 different platforms. so everything from the daily caller, fox news, buzzfeed, and the idea was, we didn t have to put any money down. we could reserve time and ads across over 50 platforms,
A hugely irresponsible left-wing log that was openly hostile to trump during the campaign. all of which is demonstrably true. i think that s accurate on the merits, you are right. but the rnc as i remember during the campaign reserved over a million dollars of space, signed a contract with buzzfeed, why would the rnc do business with and irresponsible left-wing blog that was hostile to its candidate? great question. let me just be clear, the buzzfeed story that was posted last night, its editor put as a footnote that they were unsure of the information that they were putting out and they should be taken with caution because it was unsubstantiated. to be carol about the storage that they publish themselves , we reserve time across 56 different platforms. everything from the daily caller, fox news, buzzfeed, and the idea was, we didn t have to put any money
Dating i m in i m in and out. this is not about the harm on the republican party, this is about the harm on the republican party on the women voters, this is someone who brags about being a sexual aggressor, i think the damage and stain on the gop is lost and long. the notion of suing the new york times, their editor put out a statement saying it was a work of journalism, lawsuits are launched in the absolute of proving innocence and sometimes launched in anger, do you have anything more on that? reporter: yes, trump has often threatened lawsuits and
Best new thing of the week. the fbi let people know they had arrested the suspect in the boston marathon bombing. this was the cover in the new york post. bag men. feds see these two pictured at boston marathon. and inside the paper, spread out over two pages, feds have two men in sight. pictures of men with two rings in their faces. except these two people had nothing to do with the boston bombings, nothing at all. the post immediately put out a statement that said they were wrong. the editor put out a statement that said, we stand by our story.