criteria, the jamie bolger killing being one. jamie bolger. and the udue said being one. jamie bolger. and the judge said that being one. jamie bolger. and the judge said that the being one. jamie bolger. and the judge said that the killers being one. jamie bolger. and the judge said that the killers will - judge said that the killers will only be released if they are no longer seen as a danger. they have been conversations as well about rehabilitation and what happens to these 216 year olds. is there any opportunity for rehabilitation? yes there is but opportunity for rehabilitation? yes there is but we also opportunity for rehabilitation? 19:3 there is but we also have opportunity for rehabilitation? 193 there is but we also have to keep in mind some of the mitigating factors. talks of mental health difficulties, autism, vulnerabilities, they will play a role in whatever rehabilitation is offered. but some work will need to be done with both of them becau
afternoon in broad daylight, they stabbed her so brutally she stood no chance. leaving her to die, they ran off across these fields and with across these fields, and with blood still on his hands, one of the teenage murderers caught the bus home. now the two children who butchered brianna can be identified. scarlettjenkinson was 15 at the time. sentenced today, the court heard she enjoyed the killing and remains dangerous. scarlett, i have concluded that the primary motivation for brianna s murder was your deep desire to kill. the messages reveal your fantasies and show your sadistic motives. brianna s murder was exceptionally brutal. eddie ratcliffe brought the hunting knife to kill brianna and had different reasons for targeting her. you dehumanised brianna by constantly referring to her as it and your messages about wanting to see if she would scream like a man or a girl show your own interests in killing brianna link to your hostility towards her as a transgender person
outside waddington as you can see there the cctv code outside the bus stop of the two as they meet brianna ghey before they carry out that murder. she was meeting she thought she was meeting to friends but then they take off to the park and carry out that premeditated attack. there is a family here that has lofton lost a loved one but there is also a community that may be in shock. there is also a community that may be in shock- there is also a community that may be in shock. very much so. also it s worth bearing be in shock. very much so. also it s worth bearing in be in shock. very much so. also it s worth bearing in mind be in shock. very much so. also it s worth bearing in mind prior- be in shock. very much so. also it s worth bearing in mind prior to - be in shock. very much so. also it s worth bearing in mind prior to the i worth bearing in mind prior to the sentencing today estherjoy talked about the impact graciously notjust on her but onjenkinson and rat
from more than 800 serving officials in the us and europe denouncing their governments policy on israel and the war in gaza. in a signed a statement, they warn that their own governments policies on the israel gaza war could amount to grave violations of international law . one signatory to the statement a us government official with more than 25 years national security experience told the bbc those who understand the region were not being listened to. the statement warns that their administrations risk being complicit in one of the worst human catastrophes of this century, but that their expert advice has been sidelined. it says israel has shown no boundaries in its military operations in gaza, which has resulted in tens of thousands of preventable civilian deaths. it also calls for the us and european governments to stop asserting to the public that there is a strategic and defensible rationale behind the israeli operation . the statement is signed by civil ser
and that does complicate things doesn t it? . , . ., , doesn t it? that s right. the courts have a very doesn t it? that s right. the courts have a very limited doesn t it? that s right. the courts have a very limited sentencing - doesn t it? that s right. the courts i have a very limited sentencing power in relation to murder generally and for 18 year olds and above there is a mandatory sentence for those who commit murder of life imprisonment. the courts then are charged with setting a tariff. that is a minimum period that somebody would serve in prison following which they can then apply to the parole board for release. they will always be subject to a licence which means they can be recalled. but provided they are no longer a threat to the public they can be considered for release. for those under 18 and children the law is different. children who are convicted of murder are given a sentence known as being detained at his majesty s pleasure. it s the same thing real