why don t we start with a statement from the president, an acknowledgment from the leadership and leadership from the president? why don t we get the guy with the biggest megaphone to say you know what? if anybody interferes in the e lerks, they re in big trouble. he doesn t do it. he doesn t lead on it. it s because he has insecurity about the legitimacy of the former election. that s what s the excuse for the president? it would be nice if leadership started at the top. what excuse he doesn t have to congratulate mr. putin for what he did and play with it in person and embarrass us on the world stage in helsinki. that s the appropriate question to be having, but we re not having it because we ve spent five months now since the beginning it s because the right runs away from it. i want to talk about something else. here s the distinction with a difference. i agree with mr. mueller. you didn t find proof of a criminal conspiracy.
Said i am going to i am going to pick the director from science. not from fear mongers, but actual science. i would like all of you to start thinking about science the next time you start doing crazy stuff. but the helmet? she s got to capitulate to a helmet. i mean, come on. ebola is actually a good casing for your head. all of that fear, all of the sort of fear one, it really felt like as soon as the e lerks was done, the air just came out of it. because the republicans stopped fear mongering. the thing about our fear switch being turned on so quickly, the upside of the collective tiny attention span is that it gets turned off so quickly. that s right. i do think, though, that we are more susceptible to fear than we have i mean, certainly maybe we re seeing some type of latent 9/11