instance, back in december, he won £140,600 from mirror group newspapers for 15 unlawful instances of information gathering and he settled a further 115 two months later in february. that is not what this one is about. behind me at the high court, these photographers are not particularly expecting prince harry, norare not particularly expecting prince harry, nor are we, not particularly expecting prince harry, norare we, to not particularly expecting prince harry, nor are we, to turn up, but there are some high profile celebrities involved in the general claim including hugh grant. what is today about? it is an amendment proceeding. remember, this is a civil case. the actual trial as to potentially whether there has been unlawful interceptions of information against harry would not be due to take place until next year. in this instance, we don t yet know until it is presented in court what the documents are going to say. but you would imagine that the prince s lawyers are go
feeling the pinch. the first day of spring is often a turning point of renewal. but at this farm shop near crewe, the rebirth of the economy as inflation falls to more normal levels isn t yet hitting home. the energy bills should be coming down by now. not from what i ve seen. they keep putting the standard charge for electricity up and gas. but it doesn t feel like. the cost to go out for the day and eating and drink seems to be going up as well. sometimes ijust don t even, like, | pay for my wi fi because i can t,| so we have to go without. everything isjust going up, isn t it? everything. and you don t think that that s starting to calm down or stabilise? anything you can see in your own bills? maybe our gas and electric is slightly better than it was or not as bad as it was getting, but apart from that, no, not really. the latest figures show food costs and prices in cafes and restaurants helping drive inflation down to 3.4% last month the lowest level for two and a hal
in a conversation with henry kissinger in the 1970s, china s leader mao zedong said he could live without taiwan. for now but in 100 years, we were wanted. he said and what s more? we are going to fight for it mao s one on hundred-year deadline may arrive ahead of schedule in a chinese documentary called chasing dreams the country s bravest warriors declared their willingness to die. in an all-out invasion of taiwan it was accidental. if it s too hard to remove the mines and taiwanese waters. one says we would use our bodies to clear a pathway but we shouldn t go to my fighter jet would become a missile rushing towards the enemy if i used up my ammunition says a pilot i want to see the other side of the strait. a soldier declares i ve been preparing for that day a war over taiwan would be an act of madness tens of thousands could die nearly one million jobs have disappeared. there could be a global great depression nuclear weapons would be on the table
issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
this is america s late news, fox news @ night . president biden and the white house are constantly saying that maga republicans are a threat to democracy. guess what? the vast majority of republicans are also worried about a tacks on democracy and they have an entirely different villain. the concern over democracy is quickly becoming a very big issue in the 2024 presidential election. senior national correspondent kevin clark has more on the fascinating new poll numbers. talk about your rare occurrences. imagine a world where republicans and democrats actually see eye to eye on a key issue. if the latest ap poll is to be believed as you mentioned apparently there is some common ground. the new survey showing 62% of americans believe that democracy could be at risk depending on the winner of the next presidential election. 51% say the democracy is not working. and then there is this. as the old saying goes be careful what you wish for. the majority of americans in this su