Of that guideline. it doesn t fit with american values and history, how can one person be above the law. we see countries where people want to be president to avoid prosecution and we look at richard nixon as an example of working to find corruption and do something about it. it made no sense that mueller s hands were tied and i think the committee and the american people will want to hear him say out loud if he had his drudgers what would he do? and the house of representatives can begin impeachment proceedings against the sitting president of the united states. you support that. yes. but most of the democrats in the house of representatives still oppose formal impeachment proceedings at least at this point. wolf, the straw that broke the camel s back for me was that oval office interview where the president invited hostile nations to share dirt on his opponents with him. invited treason in effect.
There s still a lot people don t know. i m surprised people think she was born in the white house. she needs to reconnect with her authentic roots, like this trip on the van. this is how she wanted to run for president. in 07 she was thinking about running for president, i had dinner with her. she didn t know anything about iowa. i talked about how grassroots is, she said to me then, if i had my drudgers i would rent a car and drive across the state. and yet in that 08 campaign, she flew in on a helicopter like the queen of sheba. that was annethetical to her ideals. i m happy as a friend of hers. do you believe she can reintroduce herself as somebody, you know, kind of just a regular lady from the midwest? i m not even sure she s going to tint deuce herself, one of the things we saw very little of
Drudgers if that s what they would have wanted to do. the best case scenario, you d want to watch this person, see who he s interacting with, see who he is calling on the phone. perhaps chatting with on computer screens while he doesn t it this police are watching him. and then they could make sure that they would have the entire group, if there is a group to be had. okay. well, let s go to fom fuentes. he is a terrorism analyst. he joins us from colombia. tom, i assume by now you ve heard what we learned. an arrest has been made in the failed bombing in times square. tell us in these kinds of situations what is important when you re talking to a suspect and at what point do you make an arrest and at what point do you tell reporters and the media what has happened? reporter: in this case, the strategy is from the time they
And it led one of mr. trump s spokes men to quit, because he believed it constituted obstruction of justice. how significant is that? extremely significant. if you were to look at those things as the tendency is look at it in isolation, you cannot do that, you have all of the context that s been provided to say, you have a pattern and a theme here that s emerging. the president of the united states, who is having a hand in either crafting or trying to someone a particular narrative, as opposed to providing truth, that is what the premise of any obstruction of justice charge is going to be, essentially saying, are you getting in the way of an investigation? an active investigation? are you doing all this within your drudgers to try to undermine our ability to seek the truth. even if it s lying to the media? you can lie to the media any time you want. but what you should remember at this point in time, they were aware it wasn t just the media who was listening, it was robert muel