until it wasn t. so do you really think nina jankowicz is anywhere near objective enough of this particular job? yes, i do. by the way, highly regarded as a subject matter expert and i don t question her objectivity. there are people in the department who have a diverse range of views and they are incredibly dedicated to mission we are not the opinion police. she has testified before congress a number of times but she is recognized as a tremendous authority and we are very fortunate to have her. bret: was a still dossier misinformation? is not for me too apply on that. bret: americans are generally open aware of censorship. that s exactly what was said of the working group to make sure our work to address a real threat to the homeland, the threat posed by russian disinformation.
the godfather of dossier misinformation. why are we giving mayorkas more responsibility? when you have more than 4 million illegal migrants in the first two years under him and his leadership, which is an oxymoron. once again this administration has stepped on several rakes. what should be a fairly simple messaging process. they did it with inflation, afghanistan, the border, they do it with education and now this ridiculous disinformation board right out of pyongyang. nina jankowicz saying she is being harassed online? people are pointing out the hypocrisy of her statements. her getting called out for what she said in the past. harris: this person will be deciding what is factual and what is not. what you are already saying is when she takes exception to something she calls it something else. that s a problem. let s get into learning a little bit more about nina
and we have the biggest liar of them all. the compromised, corrupt congenital layer adam schiff. he all about trump collusion, he lied about having secret evidence of collusion. he lied about having evidence of collusion in plain sight, the dirty dossier, in fact, he entered the dossier misinformation lies into the official record. he also lied about fisa abuse and we can prove that to, take a look. is that your representation to the nation, so there that everything the fbi did in the process of obtaining surveillance warrant on carter page absolutely follows proper protocol, every evidentiary standard was met, and there was nothing askew about that warrant ever? major, there is nothing askew at about that warrant that i can see. if the republicans were really concerned about this because everything that i have seen the fbi acted completely appropriately. sean: well, of course,