many similar movements that arae on the way. inevitably, and the few visionaries who have grasped this obvious truth weirdly , have not been welcomed by blue am america. they have been mockeda, they and derided as prophets, always are. a fewfe years ago, foro, example, a blue blond woman from montana called rachel dolezal declared that she wanas black because she decided that she was black . blackness was rachel dolezald lived experience, but she was not greeted as liberators. t gr she was almost immediateh booed off the stage and then she disappearee d and tellingly, none of the people yelling atye rachel dolezal ever explained whdy she couldn t be black. why not?t? in this country, you can change your , but not your race. really, how does that work? what species of science are weec talking about here? it was note are we defensible al and so over time, like alle ar indefensible arguments, it will collapse someday. the new york times will give g rachel dough s all its
So the take away frome inte the interview we did with trump yesterday lastedrv over an houru was whatever you think of his answers, the conversation was about real topics. it was not about global warming or systemic racism or trans rights. it was about nuclear war. tthe u.s. dollar and its strength against other currencies. u.s. dollar3 4 f1 the only one talking about these things? charlie hurt is opinion editor of the washington times, hurt s opiniwho joins with reacn to this. h mucfor coh foro coming on .n. did was did you find it refreshing to hear someone, whether you agree with him or not, talok about things that might actually define our grandchildren s lives? well well, like you said a mt minute ago, you know, he s talking about things thatbo nobody else is talking about. and , of course,dy t when wast e the last time somebody was doint doing that? well, that was when donaldhat?no trump in 2016 was running.ime. the first time he was talking about things that nobody else