law enforcement bracing for impact with police and 500 national guard troops on stand by. crowds have been gathered outside the courthouse all day with blm protesters clashing with rittenhouse backers. some of them have started marching through the streets. a jury of seven women and five men were randomly drawn by rittenhouse earlier today. the verdict doesn t even matter at this point. the democrats and the media have already written the script. kyle rittenhouse was a teenager that crossed state lines with a weapon. like kyle rittenhouse who crossed state lines ultimately taking matters into his own hand. and you have a president who is defending his vigilantism and lawlessness. that s where we are as a country. trigger happy vigilante who went on a shooting pam page at a black lives matter protest. the whole issue here is whether kyle rittenhouse was a vigilante and whether he was, you know, acting out of racial animus. that s vigilantism. that s not what people
complex, an honest observer might be able to see both sides of the case, but that is not true here, far from it. in fact, the opposite. in the very first moments of this trial, it was obvious kyle rittenhouse never should have been indicted in the first place. the key question was did kyle rittenhouse acted in self-defense that night in kenosha? the answer unequivocally is yes, obviously. no honest person could reach a different conclusion. kyle rittenhouse shot men he believed were trying to kill him. now why did he believe that? in one case, the man he shot said i plan to kill you. in the other two men, one repeatedly bashed his head with a skateboard and the other stucco loaded gun in his face. so kyle rittenhouse fought back in order to save his own life. not guessing about that, even the prosecution s witnesses made that point. so once that happened, once kyle rittenhouse is life was threatened from the what were his options exactly? he could fight back or he could allow