Well, we dont have a platform. We recognize that, historically in the Republican Party, all kinds of people have had different views on all kinds of important issues. But, there have been certain principles that are broader than particular issues where every republican disagreed and they dont anymore. This has been turned on its head. Just to give you one example, americas involvement in the world, peace through strength, we had a majority of republican members of the House Of Representatives who voted against aid to ukraine. In the very near future, no republican would have voted against aid to ukraine, i mean, we tried isolationism in the 1930s and it didnt work out very well. Now, republicans are saying, in essence, okay, Vladimir Putin, take it. You want ukraine, it is yours. Trump has said he would invite Vladimir Putin to invade nato countries. Can you imagine Ronald Reagan saying that . We have gone from mikael gorbachev, tear down this wall to Vladimir Putin, have at it. It is
They still have a lot in syria, but that s coming to an end as well. when that s gone, does it have a material effect on terrorism if isis doesn t have physical land over which to govern? that s difficult to project. isis as a command post, as a central organization will be eliminated in iraq and syria, but isis has been transitioning over the last year into another form, what we call a ghost caliphate. that s where they keep their materials and propaganda in cyberspace, and pushing these self-starting, zero dollar attacks, like you saw in london, like you saw in europe, in france. and with that you re still going to have terrorism, but you re talking about a group that will cease to exist as ma inforce body. it will still by around in very small pockets, like afghanistan and somalia, and boko haram in nigeria, but they re going to