joining me now to explain is jill wine-banks, former assistant prosecutor in the watergate, author of the watergate girl. the question is this. should they make a criminal referral to the d.o.j. on donald trump if they have the evidence? i think it would be superfluous and unnecessary. these facts are known to everyone. the department of justice is already aware of them. so why take the chance that it could be perceived as politically motivated if there is a prosecution that follows the referral? a referral is necessary when there is an obstruction of congress and they want a criminal indictment. congress can t do that. but they don t have to make a referral. the roadmap is already in front of the department of justice,
it can power hundreds of devices with three times the bandwidth. so your growing wifi needs will be met. supersonic wifi only from us. xfinity. the january 6 investigation. more members of congress are now implicated. after cnn revealed text messages from senator mike lee and congressman chip roy to then white house chief of staff mark meadows urging donald trump not to concede the election. for example, on november 7th, rory wrote, we need ammo. we need fraud examples. we need it this weekend. there is also reporting from the new york times citing people familiar with the investigation that the january 6 committee believes it has enough evidence that trump broke the law, but is split on whether to actually send a criminal referral to d.o.j.
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.