Somebody breaks the law, go after them, why don t you go after illegal immigration and all the people committing crimes coming across the border illegally. how many times could be list out the things the department of justice should be doing but they are not doing inc. to instead of who knows what will happen with it. and don t you think there is something pitiful about the way merrick garland to weed out that stuff? .ike a hostage video he exactly read this and cannot point to a single instance. i really do wish they would point to something that was a real to say this is happening and it s rampant across the country. we have a new task force to tackle it instead of all of the crime down at theow border. exactly. and at the same time, they were going off on their parents, the fbi. and we love all that stuff in the collaboration, the
Obviously, the argument of the book is the long-term effect, is a movement in this direction, this pressure on rulers over time to try to pacify their societies. not because the rulers are angels, but because its in their own interests. that s to assume everybody conforms to the norm. everybody you ve got characters like hitler or stalin or mao, a long list of these guys who are doing inc. things that don t fit the pattern. the overall long-term effect is the people who behave sort of way off the path of rational behavior tend not to do very well in the long run. does this make you very hopeful about the future? does it make you very optimistic looking forward? i ll give you a yes and no on that. the no part is i think there is a number of reasons to think that the coming generation or so might be the most dangerous in the world. it might be a period as unstable to the run-up of the first world war you just burst my optimistic