do you think it s significant? any way that donald trump s lawyers are saying the president himself cannot obstruct justice because the president is the one in charge of all investigations? they certainly have been moving the goalpost. i m not sure that lawyers who are unbiased and able to take a step back would subscribe to that theory. we have heard from legal minds that if there was corrupt intent in the president s firing of dismissal of jim comey, for example, that would, in fact, be pertinent to any kind of obstruction of justice case and the president s constitutional role as commander in chief and head of our justice department and law enforcement community wouldn t have a standing in that instance. look, i think the fact remains that we have heard varying defenses from the president s attorneys. first, that the president wasn t aware. now that the president may have been aware, they still haven t clarified that. in any ways, it doesn t wrael matter. i think those legal min