election. we also that the grand jury waaa empaneled by a soros funded d.a. called alvin bragg, who looks and acts like ta tawanna brawley era, alvidenc sharpton. so we would assumee on the bass of that evidence that it s pretty likely trump does get charged with something at some point. but charged with what? in a fre that s the question. that should matter in a free country, laws or universal laws apply to all citizens equally precisely because all citizens i are considered equal forou generations. this was very obviouss to ami to american liberals. in fact, iact was the basis ofel their worldview that was back when liberals opposedas jim crow.om and we re notet tryinhing cg to reinstate it as something called equitequiy. we are not liberals, but we retain the traditional american view, which is that laws must be applied equally or else they are not laws at all. justice must be blind or elsejut it is tyranny. so we spent the day with helpp f staff toyer on our staff t
Yes, yes. We all right. Well have a show then. Happy wednesday, everyone. Lets get started. Earlier this morning, President Biden agreed to pairbi of debates with former president trump. Biden has listed some demands, including no Live Audience, no Third Party Candidates and a group of visiting angelse th. Standby, but no live crowd. I guess joe wanted an audience of his peers. But trump not only agreed to the two debates, he offered a third one on fox news with Martha Maccallu M and brad beyer as hosts. But not to be outdone. Biden offered a fourth debate with Walter Cronkite and peter jennings. Oh, my god. Meanwhile, President Biden had an odd moment at a galaod in d. C. Last night where he acknowledged an attendee. Listen to thisnt in a. Wheres our version . Stand up, kid . I like that dress. I dont see your gow n. Let him see your gown. Well, turns out this is who he was talking to. [ la thought. And that wasnt even the weirdest thing joe said. Watch this. They want to undo what th
Hi barack obama s doj charged himm with fwith federal finance filir violations. so the premise ofemis the tho against john edwards was that he had received a million dollars in giftsan and that he spent that money in hush money payments to his mistress. a child. with whom he later had a child. obama s doj argued that the money that edwards sent to his girlfriend amounted to campaign contribution cams. o edwards never reported thatrted money, so obama s doj tried obama to send him to prison. him well, in the end, the case fell apart under the weight ofer its own incoherence.r the weig so obama s lawyers argued that anyhtf payment that could conceivably help a political poy is by by definil definition a campaign expenditure. there s no lawti campaig that says that, by the way, they just made itboi up. but if you think about it fot fe a second, it doesn t maket sense. if that were true, fliwep itp around. itit would mean that candidatesr mo could use donor money and alsone taxpay