shown he was likely to challenge it in court a second time. and that s exactly how things had proceeded. on this time with the second cancellation the reasons given by the government were very different to those that were determined by the border force official that initially canceled his visa on the morning after he arrived in this country. this time the government chose a very different path legally. essentially the argument went like this. it argued that his presence in this country was potentially, maybe, might be a threat to public order and safety because the minister said he was concerned about djokovic acting or the presence of djokovic galvanizing anti-vaccine sentiment in this country, that he could perhaps ina i inadadvertently result in fewer people getting vaccinate, could be particularly unvaccinated people on the streets.