amid more and a warning. she s going to be here with me to talk about it in her first primetime interview. again, we have never done an interview before. i m going to be speaking with her in public for the first time here ever. it is next monday live here at nine pm. you have not heard about what is in her book because it s all about a very tight embargo. but you are going to want to see what she has to say. that is a week from tonight. i will see you then, that does it for me for now. and that was time for the last word with lawrence o donnell. good evening, lawrence. reporter: good evening, that means you know what that means to me for next monday night. that means have to get everything done and ready for my show, like a good 55 minutes earlier than i usually do so that i just don t miss a word of this first ever discussion between rachel maddow and this genie. reporter: thank you, i can send you a sleep aid or something to try to help adjust your hours? i will say, th
deposition that was made. sure. i wonder you ve been involved with a lot of these. you understand what a deposition is. what more could come out in the full deposition? what else would be asked in a deposition, the way it works in a deposition, you re allowed to ask any question that could lead to admissible evidence. whereas at trial there s limitations as to what you can ask. objection, sustained. at a deposition, you can fish for information. and there s not a lot of objections the attorney on the other side could make. there s no judge there. so you use it as a discovery device. so you ask them about other people. what they ve been doing. where he was on certain days. and it s important to find out other information as to other cases. why? because you can bring in those other cases during trial as similar acts of misconduct that you engage in. so a federal judge has released this portion. yes. interesting reasoning why he released it because of this dichotomy betwee