after a monster winter storm clashes many of people in its path. hundreds of people are likely still trapped in their vehicles. one of them is an 85-year-old grandmother stuck with her son. they have been turning the car on and off to have heat and save gas. a life-threatening blizzard banning travel and declaring a state of emergency. sub vero temperatures are covering huge swaths of the country more than 100 people people remain under windchill alerts. nearly 2 million are without power. a power grid operator is now asking residents to reducing their power. people traveling home for christmas have been met with frustration. road travel in some areas is dangerous, if not impossible. today alone, 2,000 flights have been canceled. almost 5,000 have been delayed. carlos suarez is in atlanta. let s begin with cnn s polo sandoval in hard-hit buffalo, new york. in buffalo, they know snee. this is what they do. when they say it s bad, it s clearly bad. as we can see, it s pretty bl
committee s success at moving at least elite opinion on this question. so to that point, do you need these referrals from a political committee when you know the justice department is already looking into these issues? jack smith is interesting in the evidence. by making these symbolic recommendations, do you politicize an investigation that s already ongoing that merrick garland tried hard to paint as apolitical. does it help? i think you can argue that either way. there is a concern this would be seen as a political recommendation. the quantity and quality of the evidence, though, i think makes it hard to really make the claim that they are simply targeting donald trump out of some ideological difference with him over the course of his administration. i think on balance, while that concern is real and can be waved away, on balance this puts the justice department on the spot.
base for and justification for a criminal investigation of donald trump has increased at all. certainly the january 6 investigators started talking in specific statutory language about what it is they re trying to figure out if trump did it. i mean, the language from liz cheney on this has been really provocative. it s deliberate and they re making a case for that kind of evidence which is going to put the justice department on the spot. but the january 6 investigation seems to be building a real case. yeah. we will see what professor tribe thinks of what s developed this week. and rachel, please enjoy the next couple hours of your friday eve. friday eve. friday eve. yeah, that s how you say it. i shall. i will celebrate with my family. thank you. thank you, rachel. well, they are still silent. they are still hiding. they re still living in fear of
six investigators started talking in specific statutory language about what it is they are trying to figure out if trump did it. the language from liz cheney on this has been really provocative because it is deliberate, she is quoting federal statutes and they are making a public case for that kind of evidence. which is going to put the justice department on the spot. but the january six investigation seems to be building a real case. yes, we will see what professor laurence tribe delivers this week. and rachel, please enjoy the less and next couple of hours. of your friday eve. i will. i will celebrated with my family, thank you. thank you rachel. well, they are still silent. they are still hiding. they are still living in fear of the day. once the house select committee to investigate the january 6th attack on the capitol will reveal their names. they are the republican members