this sunday morning to sunday morning futures. thank you for joining us this morning. i am maria bartiromo. president biden response to the house oversight committee bribery.ns ofomo. explained to the americans impeachment cory why are youu interacted with your son andig brother and businessn associati will not comment on that, i did not.te it s a bunch of liesr:.n he didn t interact y didre not. r lies. the evidence and impact before congressman ed oversightu committee member warren donald coming up plus the national securityp.e na threat of not hoa china accountable foblr anythin. the covid, surveillance bloom propaganda war and so much more. kentucky senator rand paul on the covid corrupt and whetheris another one is on its way over plus record apprehensions at the southernth border, senator roget marshall on the battle olef poly change of the u.s. order versus money to protect ukraine and it. border. anti-semitism surging across the country with goals fors univ
maria: good morning, everyone, i m maria bartiromo. today, president biden responds to the house oversight committee allegations of bribery. can you explain to americans why you interacted with so many of your son and brother s foreign business associates? i m not going to comment, i did not, and it s just a bunch of lies. reporter: you didn t interact with they re lies. i did not. they re lies. maria: the ed and the impact with florida congressman and oversight committee member byron donalds coming up. plus, the national security threat of not holding china accountable for anything. the covid cover-up, surveillance balloon, a propaganda war, so much somewhere. key senator rand paul on the covid cover-up and whether another one is on its way over. plus, record apprehensions at the southern border. senate romer marshall on the battle over policy change at the u.s. border versus money to protect ukraine and its border. then, anti-semitism surging across the country wi
Point he makes? no responsible lawyer would charge that as a crime? well, an iffy case. it is not open and shut. in 2010 the justice department indicted john edwards who ran for president and made a similar allegation to them that he had against him that he had actually gotten contributions to pay off an extramarital affair he had in which he had a child. and it was a stretch of the campaign finance laws to say that against edwards at the time and indeed the jury acquitted edwards on one count and then deadlocked in edward s favor on the rest of the counts. it was not a success at all. so i think that you might make the argument that outside of this political context right now this is not a case based on the edwards precedent that the justice department would try to prosecute. bill: here is the tweet from the president. one of the few earlier today.