marriage that is going to be outcry. this one involves someone getting murdered because of the law. how can we pick and chose which ones? this is important since i was assistant district attorney in san francisco which is a sanctuary city not one of the cases i prosecuted and i was in charge of head of homicide that i didn t have a witness not cooperate because they are worried of being deported. i prosecuted in los angeles and san francisco for a decade and never saw it being an issue. i think you need to observe the laws and rules on the books and make uniform change if you are going to do that. that is a good starting point. new trouble for hillary clintons the justice department camrese the request to open an investigation into if she
hillary clinton over her e-mails. the justice department asked to open an investigation into whether she mishandled secret information while using a private e-mail. ed henry is following the story. reporter: i am near wall street because hillary clinton is giving a speech on the economy in a short time. all of the focus is shifting and overshadowing this speech. new questions about the e-mails in a few moments. the justice department confirming they got a referral about the e-mails she exchanged. they are testifying it is not a criminal referral as the new york times originally suggested. i have confirmed they are looking at whether classified information was mishandled and that could lead i stress could lead to criminal charges down
here. i go back at a the excuse of using the personal e-mail to avoid carrying two devices. i have one device and a work e-mail and a personal e-mail on it. i don t understand it. and i still even a criminal probe i don t know if that is going to hurt her. it is hard to imagine the justice department actually investigating her or if they doi suspect they will find out she didn t do anything wrong. this justice department. it is possible they would find her guilty of some sort of wrongdoing but just this idea the campaign is now saying you know well it isn t her under investigation it is who is it? she is the one who sent the e-mails. her server? it is your personal e-mail server. you are the one under investigation. who else would it be? i go back to be a smart person. if you are secretary of state
of state she didn t know it was a classified information. these private, independent watch dogs at the state department and intelligence community are telling us they have done reviews and believe there could have been hundreds of e-mails that were classified when she was e-mailing the clinton camp. she didn t know at the time they were classified and sent after the fact. all of this is raising questions about why she was sending sensitive information on a private server. she insisted she never shared classified information on the private sector and new questions about whether that statement is true. this is another episode of semantic gym pp nasttic gymnastics